<p>This report presents a qualitative, multi-case study analyzing the city branding strategies of nine prominent Asian-Pacific cities. The study’s primary purpose is to identify key insights for urban administrators in emerging markets by examining the application of the integrated city branding framework proposed by An et al. (2024). Utilizing a six-step structured literature review (SLR) methodology, data from cities ranked in the Anholt-Ipsos City Brands Index were collected from a diverse range of sources, including academic articles, government reports, and official websites. The data were then systematically analyzed using Nvivo 14 software to uncover patterns and themes within the framework’s five-stage process. The analysis reveals that the effectiveness of city branding is directly correlated with the maturity of urban governance and the level of stakeholder integration. Higher-tier cities demonstrate a more cohesive, cross-sectoral approach, linking economic, social, and spatial planning. A crucial finding is the significant intra-tier variation, as exemplified by the divergent, yet successful, strategies of Shanghai and Bangkok (Tier 4). The analysis moves beyond descriptive keyword analysis to show how specific, context-sensitive strategies influence outcomes, highlighting that no "one-size-fits-all" solution exists. This study’s primary contribution is the empirical validation of an integrated, multi-stage framework for city branding. It offers actionable, context-specific recommendations for urban administrators by providing a comparative analysis of how cities at different stages of development tackle common urban challenges and enhance their brand reputation.</p>