Scholarlink

<p>Intranasal monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) offer a promising cost-reducing and non-invasive alternative to systemic administration. Intranasal palivizumab prevented respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in mice but not in healthy infants. This proof-of-concept study evaluates the efficacy of intranasal palivizumab to prevent RSV infection. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, experimental infection model, 28 healthy adults (18–55 years old) were randomized 1:1 to receive 1 mg/mL palivizumab in saline nasal drops or placebo one hour prior to RSV-A Memphis 37b challenge (EU clinical trial register 2020-004137-21, August 14, 2021). The primary outcome was viral load over time, determined by RT-qPCR. Intranasal palivizumab had no effect on viral load despite a 72% reduction in symptomatic infections and marginally reduced upper respiratory tract symptoms compared to placebo. Intranasal palivizumab does not protect against RSV infection under optimally controlled conditions. Intranasal mAbs are highly unlikely to be a feasible and cost-effective method of protection against respiratory infection.</p><p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Intranasal monoclonal antibodies do not prevent respiratory infection in a randomized, controlled experimental infection trial

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月3日

查看全文
  • Jonne Terstappen,
  • Elisabeth E. Nibbelke,
  • Stephanie Ascough,
  • Emma Bergstrom,
  • Louis J. Bont,
  • Brigitte J. M. Buiteman,
  • Chris Chiu,
  • Daniela Cianci,
  • Pete Dayananda,
  • Eveline M. Delemarre,
  • Jolanda D. F. de Groot-Mijnes,
  • Matthew B. B. McCall,
  • Johannes B. Reitsma,
  • Rob Schuurman,
  • Lydia Taylor,
  • Annet Troelstra,
  • Anouk Versnel,
  • Jacqueline Vlaskamp,
  • Marco Viveen,
  • Hanneke J.A.A. van Zoggel,
  • Natalie I. Mazur

摘要

Intranasal monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) offer a promising cost-reducing and non-invasive alternative to systemic administration. Intranasal palivizumab prevented respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in mice but not in healthy infants. This proof-of-concept study evaluates the efficacy of intranasal palivizumab to prevent RSV infection. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, experimental infection model, 28 healthy adults (18–55 years old) were randomized 1:1 to receive 1 mg/mL palivizumab in saline nasal drops or placebo one hour prior to RSV-A Memphis 37b challenge (EU clinical trial register 2020-004137-21, August 14, 2021). The primary outcome was viral load over time, determined by RT-qPCR. Intranasal palivizumab had no effect on viral load despite a 72% reduction in symptomatic infections and marginally reduced upper respiratory tract symptoms compared to placebo. Intranasal palivizumab does not protect against RSV infection under optimally controlled conditions. Intranasal mAbs are highly unlikely to be a feasible and cost-effective method of protection against respiratory infection.