<p>Ecological interaction networks are an important tool for describing species interactions, but many network approaches are available, each with their strengths and weaknesses. In this Perspective, we describe how interaction networks can be differentiated in two main ways: by the extent of node aggregation (how species are lumped into groups) and by the type of information contained in links (potential versus realized interactions). We discuss the ecological questions that each network type can address, how measurements from different types of network should be interpreted, and their relative advantages. Networks with nodes aggregated to functional groups are suitable when focusing on ecosystem-level processes and ecosystem functions. Species-level networks provide information about the assembly of ecological communities or about how abiotic and biotic drivers influence species persistence. Networks with potential links are particularly useful for understanding ecological redundancy or for long-term or large-scale studies, where all potential interactions are likely to be realized. Networks of realized interactions provide access to finer mechanisms of the interplay between abiotic and biotic factors in determining ecological interactions. Identifying the advantages and limitations of different interaction networks will aid methodological decision&#xa0;making and increase the utility and applicability of ecological networks in biodiversity and conservation research programmes.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Tailoring interaction network types to answer different ecological questions

  • Benoit Gauzens,
  • Lise Thouvenot,
  • Diane S. Srivastava,
  • Pavel Kratina,
  • Gustavo Q. Romero,
  • Emilio Berti,
  • Eoin J. O’Gorman,
  • Angélica L. González,
  • Olivier Dézerald,
  • Nico Eisenhauer,
  • Mathias Pires,
  • Remo Ryser,
  • Vinicius F. Farjalla,
  • Pierre Rogy,
  • Ulrich Brose,
  • Jana S. Petermann,
  • Benoît Geslin,
  • Jes Hines

摘要

Ecological interaction networks are an important tool for describing species interactions, but many network approaches are available, each with their strengths and weaknesses. In this Perspective, we describe how interaction networks can be differentiated in two main ways: by the extent of node aggregation (how species are lumped into groups) and by the type of information contained in links (potential versus realized interactions). We discuss the ecological questions that each network type can address, how measurements from different types of network should be interpreted, and their relative advantages. Networks with nodes aggregated to functional groups are suitable when focusing on ecosystem-level processes and ecosystem functions. Species-level networks provide information about the assembly of ecological communities or about how abiotic and biotic drivers influence species persistence. Networks with potential links are particularly useful for understanding ecological redundancy or for long-term or large-scale studies, where all potential interactions are likely to be realized. Networks of realized interactions provide access to finer mechanisms of the interplay between abiotic and biotic factors in determining ecological interactions. Identifying the advantages and limitations of different interaction networks will aid methodological decision making and increase the utility and applicability of ecological networks in biodiversity and conservation research programmes.