Scholarlink

<p>Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) remains a critical yet often neglected issue in humanitarian settings. Reusable menstrual underwear (MU) offers a sustainable option where disposable products are limited, but evidence from low-income settings is scarce. This mixed-methods study assessed MU acceptability and usability among adult women in Kalehe, Democratic Republic of Congo. Participants received four MU, a hygiene kit, and instructions, with follow-up after three months through a survey (<i>n</i> = 124), and focus group discussions (<i>n</i> = 9). MU was highly accepted, with 94.3% reporting satisfaction and 98.4% preferring it to their usual MHM method. Reported benefits included comfort, hygiene, and ease of use, while challenges included absorbency, insufficient quantity, drying, and durability. Participants recommended improving MU quality, tailoring sizing, and expanding distribution, especially to adolescents. Finding suggests MU is a feasible, acceptable MHM option in a low-resource, conflict-affected setting, warranting further evaluation as part of emergency kits for displaced populations.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Feasibility and acceptability of menstrual underwear among women in displacement-prone Kalehe, Democratic Republic of Congo

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月7日

查看全文
  • Chantale Bisimirwe,
  • Sifa Maombi,
  • Sylvie Nabuki,
  • Lucie Mubelelwa,
  • Augusto E. Llosa,
  • Liliana Palacios

摘要

Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) remains a critical yet often neglected issue in humanitarian settings. Reusable menstrual underwear (MU) offers a sustainable option where disposable products are limited, but evidence from low-income settings is scarce. This mixed-methods study assessed MU acceptability and usability among adult women in Kalehe, Democratic Republic of Congo. Participants received four MU, a hygiene kit, and instructions, with follow-up after three months through a survey (n = 124), and focus group discussions (n = 9). MU was highly accepted, with 94.3% reporting satisfaction and 98.4% preferring it to their usual MHM method. Reported benefits included comfort, hygiene, and ease of use, while challenges included absorbency, insufficient quantity, drying, and durability. Participants recommended improving MU quality, tailoring sizing, and expanding distribution, especially to adolescents. Finding suggests MU is a feasible, acceptable MHM option in a low-resource, conflict-affected setting, warranting further evaluation as part of emergency kits for displaced populations.