<p>The European Union Drinking Water Directive (DWD) established limit values for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) owing to health concerns. Here we examine how European Union member states have implemented the DWD limit values, which went into effect in January 2026. All but one member state have adopted the sum of PFAS limit of 0.1 µg l<sup>−1</sup>. Several member states have also adopted the PFAS total limit of 0.5 µg l<sup>−1</sup> in combination with the sum of PFAS limit, whereas no one has adopted the PFAS total parameter in isolation. Member states often go beyond DWD requirements and nine have implemented the sum of four PFASs — that is, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS). These limit values have been implemented faster but also more sporadically resulting in different levels of protection. The division between monitoring water quality and legal oversight may counteract, for instance, effective mitigation and institutional collaboration. Finally, supplying clean drinking water in compliance with the DWD can be challenging if trifluoroacetic acid is considered a toxicological relevant pesticide metabolite.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Implementation of the Drinking Water Directive limit values for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in Europe

  • Steffen Foss Hansen,
  • Rune Hjorth,
  • Anders Baun,
  • Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen

摘要

The European Union Drinking Water Directive (DWD) established limit values for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) owing to health concerns. Here we examine how European Union member states have implemented the DWD limit values, which went into effect in January 2026. All but one member state have adopted the sum of PFAS limit of 0.1 µg l−1. Several member states have also adopted the PFAS total limit of 0.5 µg l−1 in combination with the sum of PFAS limit, whereas no one has adopted the PFAS total parameter in isolation. Member states often go beyond DWD requirements and nine have implemented the sum of four PFASs — that is, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS). These limit values have been implemented faster but also more sporadically resulting in different levels of protection. The division between monitoring water quality and legal oversight may counteract, for instance, effective mitigation and institutional collaboration. Finally, supplying clean drinking water in compliance with the DWD can be challenging if trifluoroacetic acid is considered a toxicological relevant pesticide metabolite.