Scholarlink

<p>Craving and maladaptive choices are intertwined across addictive disorders, yet the specific computational mechanisms mediating their interactions remain elusive. Here we tested a hypothesis that momentary craving and reinforcement learning influence each other during substance-related decision-making. Two substance-using groups with moderate to high addiction risk levels (alcohol drinkers and cannabis users; total <i>n</i> = 132) performed a decision-making task in which they received a group-specific addictive cue or monetary outcomes and reported moment-to-moment subjective craving. Computational modeling revealed that momentary craving biased substance-specific learning rate in both groups, but in opposite directions. In addition, expected values and outcomes jointly influenced elicited craving across groups and decision contexts. Finally, regressions incorporating model-derived parameters best predicted alcohol, but not cannabis, addiction risk scores, supporting the selective utility of using these model-based parameters in making clinical predictions. Together, these findings provide a computational framework that accounts for the interaction between craving and maladaptive choices across addictive domains.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A computational mechanism linking momentary craving and decision-making in alcohol drinkers and cannabis users

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月26日

查看全文
  • Kaustubh R. Kulkarni,
  • Laura A. Berner,
  • Shawn A. Rhoads,
  • Vincenzo G. Fiore,
  • Daniela Schiller,
  • Xiaosi Gu

摘要

Craving and maladaptive choices are intertwined across addictive disorders, yet the specific computational mechanisms mediating their interactions remain elusive. Here we tested a hypothesis that momentary craving and reinforcement learning influence each other during substance-related decision-making. Two substance-using groups with moderate to high addiction risk levels (alcohol drinkers and cannabis users; total n = 132) performed a decision-making task in which they received a group-specific addictive cue or monetary outcomes and reported moment-to-moment subjective craving. Computational modeling revealed that momentary craving biased substance-specific learning rate in both groups, but in opposite directions. In addition, expected values and outcomes jointly influenced elicited craving across groups and decision contexts. Finally, regressions incorporating model-derived parameters best predicted alcohol, but not cannabis, addiction risk scores, supporting the selective utility of using these model-based parameters in making clinical predictions. Together, these findings provide a computational framework that accounts for the interaction between craving and maladaptive choices across addictive domains.