Scholarlink

<p>Sea-level rise (SLR) creates uncertainty for maritime jurisdiction under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), particularly where coastal baselines may change over time. This study develops a regional geospatial dataset from deposited baseline coordinates, official charts and delimitation records to assess how maritime zones across the Pacific could contract under 1 m, 2 m and 5 m SLR scenarios if baselines were treated as ambulatory. Using CoastalDEM90 elevation data and maritime boundary modelling in ArcGIS Pro, the analysis estimates potential changes to the outer limits of jurisdiction across Pacific Island states and selected overseas territories. Results show uneven projected exposure. Regional contraction remains modest at lower scenarios, reaching approximately 1.19% at 1 m and 1.29% at 2 m, but increases to 6.50% under 5 m SLR. Some jurisdictions face substantially higher proportional contraction due to reliance on low-lying peripheral features that contribute to present maritime limits. These findings do not predict legal outcomes. They identify the spatial consequences that could arise under one contested legal interpretation and show why emerging stability-oriented legal practice matters. The study demonstrates the value of integrating geospatial analysis with legal scholarship and highlights implications for baseline stability, fisheries governance and equity in a changing ocean.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Shifting baselines and maritime jurisdiction in the Pacific

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月17日

查看全文
  • Oliver Tiliouine

摘要

Sea-level rise (SLR) creates uncertainty for maritime jurisdiction under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), particularly where coastal baselines may change over time. This study develops a regional geospatial dataset from deposited baseline coordinates, official charts and delimitation records to assess how maritime zones across the Pacific could contract under 1 m, 2 m and 5 m SLR scenarios if baselines were treated as ambulatory. Using CoastalDEM90 elevation data and maritime boundary modelling in ArcGIS Pro, the analysis estimates potential changes to the outer limits of jurisdiction across Pacific Island states and selected overseas territories. Results show uneven projected exposure. Regional contraction remains modest at lower scenarios, reaching approximately 1.19% at 1 m and 1.29% at 2 m, but increases to 6.50% under 5 m SLR. Some jurisdictions face substantially higher proportional contraction due to reliance on low-lying peripheral features that contribute to present maritime limits. These findings do not predict legal outcomes. They identify the spatial consequences that could arise under one contested legal interpretation and show why emerging stability-oriented legal practice matters. The study demonstrates the value of integrating geospatial analysis with legal scholarship and highlights implications for baseline stability, fisheries governance and equity in a changing ocean.