Scholarlink

<p>Efforts to counter climate change skepticism have become a key sociopolitical issue. Researchers increasingly recognize the role of “elite cues” from political leaders in shaping climate attitudes; yet quantitative analysis of specific recent events, such as President Trump’s 2017 inauguration, remains limited. Through two research objectives, this study examines whether Trump’s first inauguration modified the association between political identity (Democrat, Republican, and Independent) and overall climate change beliefs among Americans, and whether it influenced support or opposition for specific environmental policies, such as fracking and nuclear energy. Multinomial regression models, controlled for socio-demographic variables, reveal significant changes in association, as well as a potential “backlash effect”: the administration’s anti-climate stance appeared to strengthen pro-climate beliefs among Democrats and Independents, while Republicans’ beliefs remained largely unchanged. The study’s findings invite a more complex interpretation, compared to earlier literature, of the impacts of political cues on climate skepticism today.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Backlash or reinforcement? Donald Trump’s 2017 inauguration and shifting climate beliefs in the United States

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月20日

查看全文
  • Yidan Sun,
  • Ke Shen,
  • Mayank Kejriwal

摘要

Efforts to counter climate change skepticism have become a key sociopolitical issue. Researchers increasingly recognize the role of “elite cues” from political leaders in shaping climate attitudes; yet quantitative analysis of specific recent events, such as President Trump’s 2017 inauguration, remains limited. Through two research objectives, this study examines whether Trump’s first inauguration modified the association between political identity (Democrat, Republican, and Independent) and overall climate change beliefs among Americans, and whether it influenced support or opposition for specific environmental policies, such as fracking and nuclear energy. Multinomial regression models, controlled for socio-demographic variables, reveal significant changes in association, as well as a potential “backlash effect”: the administration’s anti-climate stance appeared to strengthen pro-climate beliefs among Democrats and Independents, while Republicans’ beliefs remained largely unchanged. The study’s findings invite a more complex interpretation, compared to earlier literature, of the impacts of political cues on climate skepticism today.