Scholarlink

<p>Understanding how molecular structure relates to odor perception is a longstanding problem, with important implications for fragrance development and sensory science. In this study, we present an advanced comparative analysis of machine learning approaches for predicting fragrance odors, examining both individual descriptor‐based models and integrated frameworks. Using a curated dataset of 8681 compounds from ten expert sources, we benchmark functional group fingerprints, classical molecular descriptors, and Morgan structural fingerprints across Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. The Morgan-fingerprint-based XGBoost model achieves the highest discrimination (AUROC 0.828, AUPRC 0.237), outperforming descriptor-based models. Our findings highlight the superior representational capacity of molecular fingerprints to capture olfactory cues, not only achieving high predictive performance but also revealing a continuous, interpretable scent space that aligns with perceptual and chemical relationships. This paves the way for data-driven research into olfactory mechanisms, alongside the next generation of in silico odor prediction.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A comparative study of machine learning models on molecular fingerprints for odor decoding

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月25日

查看全文
  • Jinyoung Suh,
  • Yeonju Hong,
  • Chunho Park

摘要

Understanding how molecular structure relates to odor perception is a longstanding problem, with important implications for fragrance development and sensory science. In this study, we present an advanced comparative analysis of machine learning approaches for predicting fragrance odors, examining both individual descriptor‐based models and integrated frameworks. Using a curated dataset of 8681 compounds from ten expert sources, we benchmark functional group fingerprints, classical molecular descriptors, and Morgan structural fingerprints across Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. The Morgan-fingerprint-based XGBoost model achieves the highest discrimination (AUROC 0.828, AUPRC 0.237), outperforming descriptor-based models. Our findings highlight the superior representational capacity of molecular fingerprints to capture olfactory cues, not only achieving high predictive performance but also revealing a continuous, interpretable scent space that aligns with perceptual and chemical relationships. This paves the way for data-driven research into olfactory mechanisms, alongside the next generation of in silico odor prediction.