Scholarlink

<p>Specialized feeding methods evolved repeatedly from a suction-feeding strategy in cichlids. How algae-eaters altered their suction mechanics to transport detached algae efficiently, and how this may hinder capturing larger prey, remains unclear. Here, we study the kinematics and time-resolved volumetrics of a piscivore, an algae picker/nibbler, and an algae scraper from Lake Malawi feeding on attached algae tablets and free pieces of shrimp. Algae specialists lack the common anterior-to-posterior expansion and compression waves of the head, instead exhibiting a synchronous expansion pattern. This alternative pattern may allow algae retention due to low-amplitude dilation of the gill rakers, maximized suction flow speeds for a given local expansion amplitude, and rapid sequences of suction cycles. The trade-off between powerful suction and efficient feeding on algae may explain why algae scrapers’ opportunistic switching to suction feeding can only be successful on easy prey, and may have impacted cichlid diversification and trophic niche constraining.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

An alternative pattern of head expansion during feeding in cichlids

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月9日

查看全文
  • Jana De Ridder,
  • Vincent Dujardin,
  • Julia Camacho Garcia,
  • Wilson Sawasawa,
  • Peter Aerts,
  • Hannes Svardal,
  • Sam Van Wassenbergh

摘要

Specialized feeding methods evolved repeatedly from a suction-feeding strategy in cichlids. How algae-eaters altered their suction mechanics to transport detached algae efficiently, and how this may hinder capturing larger prey, remains unclear. Here, we study the kinematics and time-resolved volumetrics of a piscivore, an algae picker/nibbler, and an algae scraper from Lake Malawi feeding on attached algae tablets and free pieces of shrimp. Algae specialists lack the common anterior-to-posterior expansion and compression waves of the head, instead exhibiting a synchronous expansion pattern. This alternative pattern may allow algae retention due to low-amplitude dilation of the gill rakers, maximized suction flow speeds for a given local expansion amplitude, and rapid sequences of suction cycles. The trade-off between powerful suction and efficient feeding on algae may explain why algae scrapers’ opportunistic switching to suction feeding can only be successful on easy prey, and may have impacted cichlid diversification and trophic niche constraining.