Scholarlink

<p>Electroencephalography (EEG) preprocessing varies widely between studies, but its impact on classification performance remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we analyzed seven experiments with 40 participants drawn from the public <i>ERP CORE</i> dataset. We systematically varied key preprocessing steps, such as filtering, referencing, baseline interval, detrending, and multiple artifact correction steps, all of which were implemented in MNE-Python. Then we performed trial-wise binary classification (i.e., decoding) using neural networks (<i>EEGNet</i>), or time-resolved logistic regressions. Our findings demonstrate that preprocessing choices influenced decoding performance considerably. All artifact correction steps reduced decoding performance across experiments and models, while higher high-pass filter cutoffs consistently increased decoding performance. For <i>EEGNet</i>, baseline correction further increased decoding performance, and for time-resolved classifiers, linear detrending, and lower low-pass filter cutoffs increased decoding performance. The influence of other preprocessing choices was specific for each experiment or event-related potential component. The current results underline the importance of carefully selecting preprocessing steps for EEG-based decoding. While uncorrected artifacts may increase decoding performance, this comes at the expense of interpretability and model validity, as the model may exploit structured noise rather than the neural signal.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

How EEG preprocessing shapes decoding performance

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月10日

查看全文
  • Roman Kessler,
  • Alexander Enge,
  • Michael A. Skeide

摘要

Electroencephalography (EEG) preprocessing varies widely between studies, but its impact on classification performance remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we analyzed seven experiments with 40 participants drawn from the public ERP CORE dataset. We systematically varied key preprocessing steps, such as filtering, referencing, baseline interval, detrending, and multiple artifact correction steps, all of which were implemented in MNE-Python. Then we performed trial-wise binary classification (i.e., decoding) using neural networks (EEGNet), or time-resolved logistic regressions. Our findings demonstrate that preprocessing choices influenced decoding performance considerably. All artifact correction steps reduced decoding performance across experiments and models, while higher high-pass filter cutoffs consistently increased decoding performance. For EEGNet, baseline correction further increased decoding performance, and for time-resolved classifiers, linear detrending, and lower low-pass filter cutoffs increased decoding performance. The influence of other preprocessing choices was specific for each experiment or event-related potential component. The current results underline the importance of carefully selecting preprocessing steps for EEG-based decoding. While uncorrected artifacts may increase decoding performance, this comes at the expense of interpretability and model validity, as the model may exploit structured noise rather than the neural signal.