<p>Children and youth face rising mental health challenges in an increasingly digital world. Universal Tier 1 digital mental health interventions (DMHIs)—low-intensity, high-reach supports for non-clinical populations—have emerged as scalable tools for early-stage needs, but effectiveness remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 57 studies (<i>N</i> = 43,973) assessed impacts across emotional, behavioural, social, and cognitive outcomes, and examined whether delivery format (hybrid vs. virtual) and timing (post-intervention vs. follow-up) influenced results. Across outcomes, 9/16 pooled effect sizes were statistically significant, indicating small effects. Hybrid interventions, those incorporating any in-person component, showed more consistent and sustained benefits, with moderate-certainty evidence at follow-up, though most pooled findings were low certainty. Parents of younger children and marginalized children and youth were notably understudied. Future research must prioritize marginalized populations, broaden outcome evaluation, and deliver large-scale, high-quality trials to inform inclusive, sustainable implementation of digital mental health supports.</p><p>INPLASY registration number: INPLASY202490026.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Universal digital mental health interventions for children and youth a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Kaitlin Di Pierdomenico,
  • Oana Bucsea,
  • Haleh Hashemi,
  • Arianna Leguia,
  • Anne Lovegrove,
  • Robert Cribbie,
  • Rebecca Pillai Riddell

摘要

Children and youth face rising mental health challenges in an increasingly digital world. Universal Tier 1 digital mental health interventions (DMHIs)—low-intensity, high-reach supports for non-clinical populations—have emerged as scalable tools for early-stage needs, but effectiveness remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 57 studies (N = 43,973) assessed impacts across emotional, behavioural, social, and cognitive outcomes, and examined whether delivery format (hybrid vs. virtual) and timing (post-intervention vs. follow-up) influenced results. Across outcomes, 9/16 pooled effect sizes were statistically significant, indicating small effects. Hybrid interventions, those incorporating any in-person component, showed more consistent and sustained benefits, with moderate-certainty evidence at follow-up, though most pooled findings were low certainty. Parents of younger children and marginalized children and youth were notably understudied. Future research must prioritize marginalized populations, broaden outcome evaluation, and deliver large-scale, high-quality trials to inform inclusive, sustainable implementation of digital mental health supports.

INPLASY registration number: INPLASY202490026.