Scholarlink

<p>Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Heart sound analysis has been investigated as a noninvasive approach to CAD detection, although existing evidence has been inconsistent. This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic performance of heart sound analysis for identifying CAD (≥50% stenosis). A search of four databases identified 1082 records, among which 40 studies involving 13,814 participants met the inclusion criteria. Among the 21 studies using signal processing methods, all but one of the larger studies (&gt;50 participants, <i>n</i> = 15) reported diagnostic accuracy below 75%. The majority of signal processing studies lacked validation on independent datasets, thereby limiting confidence in the reliability of their reported performance. In contrast, 15 of the 19 studies applying machine learning-based methods reported accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity consistently above 80%. Moreover, 15 of these 19 studies conducted independent dataset validation, indicating comparatively stronger generalizability. Studies that used the full heart sound signal as model input also tended to achieve higher sensitivity than those using only the diastolic component, suggesting that utilizing the complete waveform preserves diagnostically informative features. These findings indicate that machine learning-based heart sound analysis may have diagnostic value for CAD, and larger multicenter studies are needed to further assess its clinical applicability and robustness.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Coronary artery disease diagnosis with signal processing and machine learning of heart sound signals: a systematic review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月16日

查看全文
  • Aikeliyaer Ainiwaer,
  • Tom J.A.J. Konings,
  • Kaisaierjiang Kadier,
  • Xiang Ma,
  • Muhammet Emin Akpulat,
  • Frits W. Prinzen,
  • Tammo Delhaas,
  • Hongxing Luo

摘要

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Heart sound analysis has been investigated as a noninvasive approach to CAD detection, although existing evidence has been inconsistent. This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic performance of heart sound analysis for identifying CAD (≥50% stenosis). A search of four databases identified 1082 records, among which 40 studies involving 13,814 participants met the inclusion criteria. Among the 21 studies using signal processing methods, all but one of the larger studies (>50 participants, n = 15) reported diagnostic accuracy below 75%. The majority of signal processing studies lacked validation on independent datasets, thereby limiting confidence in the reliability of their reported performance. In contrast, 15 of the 19 studies applying machine learning-based methods reported accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity consistently above 80%. Moreover, 15 of these 19 studies conducted independent dataset validation, indicating comparatively stronger generalizability. Studies that used the full heart sound signal as model input also tended to achieve higher sensitivity than those using only the diastolic component, suggesting that utilizing the complete waveform preserves diagnostically informative features. These findings indicate that machine learning-based heart sound analysis may have diagnostic value for CAD, and larger multicenter studies are needed to further assess its clinical applicability and robustness.