<p>A new Section 1557 rule bans discrimination by AI-based clinical decision tools, with compliance required by May 2025. This paper explores challenges in identifying and mitigating algorithmic bias, especially where outcome disparities exist. We emphasize the need to audit high-risk tools, address proxy discrimination, and provide standardized guidance. Political uncertainty around enforcement complicates long-term planning, making expanded regulatory support essential for health systems and developers alike.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The future of algorithmic nondiscrimination compliance in the affordable care act

  • William G. La Cava,
  • I. Glenn Cohen,
  • Jaya Aysola

摘要

A new Section 1557 rule bans discrimination by AI-based clinical decision tools, with compliance required by May 2025. This paper explores challenges in identifying and mitigating algorithmic bias, especially where outcome disparities exist. We emphasize the need to audit high-risk tools, address proxy discrimination, and provide standardized guidance. Political uncertainty around enforcement complicates long-term planning, making expanded regulatory support essential for health systems and developers alike.