Scholarlink

<p>Findings from a previous study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05118035) demonstrated that an AI-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG), combining AI reports and physician alerts, effectively identified hospitalized patients at high risk of mortality and reduced all-cause mortality. This study evaluates its cost-effectiveness from the health payer’s perspective in Taiwan over a 90-day post-intervention period. Cost data were obtained from electronic health records of participating hospitals, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per death averted were calculated. Non-parametric bootstrap techniques were used to address uncertainty. Among 15,965 patients, 90-day all-cause mortality was 3.6% in the intervention group versus 4.3% in controls. Medication and ICU costs were higher in the AI-ECG group, but overall medical cost was similar ($6204 vs. $5803). The ICER was $59,500 (95% CI: $-4657 to $385,950) per death averted. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed that 95% of the probability mass lies below a willingness-to-pay threshold of $409,321, supporting favorable cost-effectiveness despite uncertainty.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Economic analysis of an AI-enabled ECG alert system: impact on mortality outcomes from a pragmatic randomized trial

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月11日

查看全文
  • Ping-Hsuan Hsieh,
  • Chin Lin,
  • Chin-Sheng Lin,
  • Wei-Ting Liu,
  • Tsung-Kun Lin,
  • Dung-Jang Tsai,
  • Yi-Jen Hung,
  • Yuan-Hao Chen,
  • Chih-Yuan Lin,
  • Shih-Hua Lin,
  • Chien-Sung Tsai

摘要

Findings from a previous study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05118035) demonstrated that an AI-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG), combining AI reports and physician alerts, effectively identified hospitalized patients at high risk of mortality and reduced all-cause mortality. This study evaluates its cost-effectiveness from the health payer’s perspective in Taiwan over a 90-day post-intervention period. Cost data were obtained from electronic health records of participating hospitals, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per death averted were calculated. Non-parametric bootstrap techniques were used to address uncertainty. Among 15,965 patients, 90-day all-cause mortality was 3.6% in the intervention group versus 4.3% in controls. Medication and ICU costs were higher in the AI-ECG group, but overall medical cost was similar ($6204 vs. $5803). The ICER was $59,500 (95% CI: $-4657 to $385,950) per death averted. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed that 95% of the probability mass lies below a willingness-to-pay threshold of $409,321, supporting favorable cost-effectiveness despite uncertainty.