Scholarlink

<p>Electroencephalography (EEG) emotion recognition is challenged by non-stationarity and distribution shifts across sessions and participants. We propose MMPF-Net, a parallel architecture that extracts temporal, STFT-based spectral, and learned spatial-projection representations from the same EEG segment. Three 128-dimensional branch features are aligned by L2 normalisation and combined through sample-wise gated concatenation. Evaluation included trial-level within-subject five-fold cross-validation, leave-one-session-out, and leave-one-subject-out protocols on SEED, plus external within-subject validation on DEAP. MMPF-Net achieved 96.53 ± 0.82%, 85.76 ± 4.96%, and 70.25 ± 5.94% Accuracy under the three SEED protocols, respectively, and 90.03 ± 4.51% and 89.26 ± 4.73% for DEAP valence and arousal. Participant-level paired analyses showed statistically supported Accuracy gains over EEG Conformer across the reported protocols. Extended ablations indicated contributions from all three branches, sample-wise gating, and the frequency branch beyond parameter count, while several alternative weighted-scoring schemes were not significantly different after Holm correction. These findings support MMPF-Net for participant-specific EEG emotion decoding, while performance under session, participant, and dataset shifts remains limited.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

MMPF-Net integrates temporal, spectral and spatial projection features for EEG emotion recognition

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年8月3日

查看全文
  • Xiaozhong Geng,
  • Shuai Wu,
  • Ping Yu,
  • Han Wang,
  • Xiaochen Zhang,
  • Zhanghuai Xiong,
  • Tianze Dai,
  • Tiehua Chen

摘要

Electroencephalography (EEG) emotion recognition is challenged by non-stationarity and distribution shifts across sessions and participants. We propose MMPF-Net, a parallel architecture that extracts temporal, STFT-based spectral, and learned spatial-projection representations from the same EEG segment. Three 128-dimensional branch features are aligned by L2 normalisation and combined through sample-wise gated concatenation. Evaluation included trial-level within-subject five-fold cross-validation, leave-one-session-out, and leave-one-subject-out protocols on SEED, plus external within-subject validation on DEAP. MMPF-Net achieved 96.53 ± 0.82%, 85.76 ± 4.96%, and 70.25 ± 5.94% Accuracy under the three SEED protocols, respectively, and 90.03 ± 4.51% and 89.26 ± 4.73% for DEAP valence and arousal. Participant-level paired analyses showed statistically supported Accuracy gains over EEG Conformer across the reported protocols. Extended ablations indicated contributions from all three branches, sample-wise gating, and the frequency branch beyond parameter count, while several alternative weighted-scoring schemes were not significantly different after Holm correction. These findings support MMPF-Net for participant-specific EEG emotion decoding, while performance under session, participant, and dataset shifts remains limited.