Scholarlink

<p>To elucidate the energy dissipation mechanisms of particle dampers, three configurations are investigated: USPD, ODMPD, and TDMPD. Energy conversion occurs through three pathways: kinetic energy dissipation, internal energy accumulation, and collision-induced acoustic radiation. Experiments on a single-degree-of-freedom platform evaluate energy transfer under varying excitation frequencies, clearances, and amplitudes. At low frequency, only a small fraction of input energy converts to acoustic energy. At high frequency, acoustic radiation efficiency drops significantly. USPD dissipates energy through directional collisions and is kinetic-energy-dominated, while ODMPD and TDMPD rely on inter-particle friction and compression, being internal-energy-dominated. USPD performs better at high frequency due to rapid response. TDMPD achieves optimal damping at low frequency due to strong nonlinearity. ODMPD shows modest performance due to limited particle motion.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Analysis and experimental verification of the energy transfer mechanism in particle dampers for vibration reduction

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月12日

查看全文
  • Wangqiang Xiao,
  • Yuanyi Luo,
  • Xiaoxuan Xie

摘要

To elucidate the energy dissipation mechanisms of particle dampers, three configurations are investigated: USPD, ODMPD, and TDMPD. Energy conversion occurs through three pathways: kinetic energy dissipation, internal energy accumulation, and collision-induced acoustic radiation. Experiments on a single-degree-of-freedom platform evaluate energy transfer under varying excitation frequencies, clearances, and amplitudes. At low frequency, only a small fraction of input energy converts to acoustic energy. At high frequency, acoustic radiation efficiency drops significantly. USPD dissipates energy through directional collisions and is kinetic-energy-dominated, while ODMPD and TDMPD rely on inter-particle friction and compression, being internal-energy-dominated. USPD performs better at high frequency due to rapid response. TDMPD achieves optimal damping at low frequency due to strong nonlinearity. ODMPD shows modest performance due to limited particle motion.