<p>The Aggregation operators (AOs) play an essential part in decision-making, particularly when there are other things to consider. The current study’s objective is to construct AOs and operational rules within an intuitionistic fuzzy Z-number (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"><EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{IFZN}\)</EquationSource></InlineEquation>) framework. In order to accomplish this, we create special operational laws that give an acceptable or equitable solution for <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"><EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{IFZNs}\)</EquationSource></InlineEquation> through the use of the idea of proportionate distribution. In this article, we are introduced to <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"><EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{IFZNs}\)</EquationSource></InlineEquation> based on fairly operators which is probably a new concept in fuzzy theory. The proposed study aims to provide a set of weighted AOs using <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"><EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{IFZNs}\)</EquationSource></InlineEquation>. In this research, we looked at fairly operators for the <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"><EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{IFZNs}\)</EquationSource></InlineEquation>. Additionally, multi-attribute group decision-making challenges are resolved by applying the suggested fairness operators for the <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"><EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{IFZNs}\)</EquationSource></InlineEquation>. With numerical examples of group decision-making difficulties, we present the proposed models. Likewise, a fairly multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique is established by using recommended reasonable AOs with assessments from numerous decision-makers (DMs) and partially weighting the data under <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"><EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{IFZNs}\)</EquationSource></InlineEquation>. We assert that the new technique is far more accurate and efficient than the current model. Likewise, an extensive execution of the suggested methodology is furnished that demonstrates the efficient utilization of the assigned tasks. Furthermore, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) is incorporated as a ranking validation mechanism to evaluate the relational closeness of alternatives under the proposed <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"><EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{IFZN}\)</EquationSource></InlineEquation> environment. Comparative analysis demonstrates that the proposed <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"><EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{IFZN}\)</EquationSource></InlineEquation> fairly aggregation framework provides reliable and consistent decision-making results under uncertain group assessment information.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

An advanced hybrid intuitionistic fuzzy Z-number framework for IT impact analysis in E-learning systems

  • Muhammad Shazib Hameed,
  • Usama bin Khalid,
  • Rumaisa Saheeb,
  • Shahbaz Ali,
  • Mamo Abebe Ashebo,
  • Sardor Jumaniyazov,
  • Abdujabar Rasulov

摘要

The Aggregation operators (AOs) play an essential part in decision-making, particularly when there are other things to consider. The current study’s objective is to construct AOs and operational rules within an intuitionistic fuzzy Z-number (\(\textrm{IFZN}\)) framework. In order to accomplish this, we create special operational laws that give an acceptable or equitable solution for \(\textrm{IFZNs}\) through the use of the idea of proportionate distribution. In this article, we are introduced to \(\textrm{IFZNs}\) based on fairly operators which is probably a new concept in fuzzy theory. The proposed study aims to provide a set of weighted AOs using \(\textrm{IFZNs}\). In this research, we looked at fairly operators for the \(\textrm{IFZNs}\). Additionally, multi-attribute group decision-making challenges are resolved by applying the suggested fairness operators for the \(\textrm{IFZNs}\). With numerical examples of group decision-making difficulties, we present the proposed models. Likewise, a fairly multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique is established by using recommended reasonable AOs with assessments from numerous decision-makers (DMs) and partially weighting the data under \(\textrm{IFZNs}\). We assert that the new technique is far more accurate and efficient than the current model. Likewise, an extensive execution of the suggested methodology is furnished that demonstrates the efficient utilization of the assigned tasks. Furthermore, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) is incorporated as a ranking validation mechanism to evaluate the relational closeness of alternatives under the proposed \(\textrm{IFZN}\) environment. Comparative analysis demonstrates that the proposed \(\textrm{IFZN}\) fairly aggregation framework provides reliable and consistent decision-making results under uncertain group assessment information.