Scholarlink

<p>During an infectious disease outbreak, policymakers face the critical challenge of balancing the healthcare burden with the socioeconomic consequences of social distancing. To facilitate this complex decision-making process, we developed an integrated framework that combines multi-objective optimization, economic evaluation, and an interactive dashboard. This dashboard allows stakeholders to input dynamic cost parameters and immediately derive cost-optimal intervention strategies. We validated this framework using data from the early COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea. Our results demonstrate that cost-optimal solutions remained remarkably consistent across a wide range of costs per infection (from 4,410 USD to 361,000 USD), exhibiting similar transmission reduction patterns. This suggests that the cost-optimal policy is relatively insensitive to variations in the estimated cost per infection, providing a robust basis for intervention planning. By synthesizing rapid optimization with rigorous economic evaluation, our framework offers a scalable tool for timely, evidence-based decision-making during the urgent situation of a pandemic.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A multi objective framework with an interactive dashboard for cost optimal infectious disease management

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月1日

查看全文
  • Jongmin Lee,
  • Renier Mendoza,
  • Victoria May P. Mendoza,
  • Eunok Jung

摘要

During an infectious disease outbreak, policymakers face the critical challenge of balancing the healthcare burden with the socioeconomic consequences of social distancing. To facilitate this complex decision-making process, we developed an integrated framework that combines multi-objective optimization, economic evaluation, and an interactive dashboard. This dashboard allows stakeholders to input dynamic cost parameters and immediately derive cost-optimal intervention strategies. We validated this framework using data from the early COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea. Our results demonstrate that cost-optimal solutions remained remarkably consistent across a wide range of costs per infection (from 4,410 USD to 361,000 USD), exhibiting similar transmission reduction patterns. This suggests that the cost-optimal policy is relatively insensitive to variations in the estimated cost per infection, providing a robust basis for intervention planning. By synthesizing rapid optimization with rigorous economic evaluation, our framework offers a scalable tool for timely, evidence-based decision-making during the urgent situation of a pandemic.