<p>The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is repurposed here as a feature map within a hybrid quantum–classical classifier, augmented by a chaos-informed diagnostic. We extract a scalar chaos feature by evaluating an Out-Of-Time-Ordered correlators (OTOC) along parameter-scaling rays through the trained circuit, computing spacings between local minima, and standardizing them via a pre-fitted lognormal model. To probe finite-size effects, we sweep the number of qubits <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\in \{4,6,8,10\}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> at fixed depth <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p=2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and train two models on a balanced 1,000-sample MNIST subset: a <i>StandardHybrid</i> using the <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> local Pauli-<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Z\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> expectations, and a <i>ChaosAwareHybrid</i> which appends the OTOC-derived scalar. We perform multi-run, 5-fold cross-validation with a paired design (identical seeds/folds across models) and report mean±SD, paired mean differences <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, 95% t- and bootstrap CIs, exact permutation/sign tests, win-rates (Wilson 95% CI), and paired effect sizes. Across <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N_\text {pairs}=\{50,50,67,50\}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n=\{4,6,8,10\}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the chaos-aware variant significantly improves test accuracy at <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\in \{4,6,8\}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta \approx +0.016\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–<InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(+0.018\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, all 95% CIs excluding zero, permutation <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p\approx 0\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, high win-rates (86–100%), and large paired effects (<InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(d_z\approx 1.0\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–2.3). At <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n=10\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> the effect reverses (<InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta =-0.022\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, 2% win-rate, <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(d_z=-2.20\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), indicating over-sensitivity. The best average accuracy occurs at <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n=8\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (<InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(0.9006\pm 0.0069\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>; <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta =+0.0180\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>; 100% wins). Per-epoch panels (train/val/test; mean±1&#xa0;SD) reveal a “Goldilocks” width at which expressivity and sensitivity are balanced. These results show that a calibrated chaos diagnostic can enhance hybrid quantum–classical classifiers in resource-limited regimes and provide a principled knob to match circuit expressivity to many-body sensitivity.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Exploiting quantum chaos diagnostics in QAOA for enhanced hybrid quantum classical deep learning classification

  • Javier Villalba-Díez,
  • Juan Carlos Losada-González

摘要

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is repurposed here as a feature map within a hybrid quantum–classical classifier, augmented by a chaos-informed diagnostic. We extract a scalar chaos feature by evaluating an Out-Of-Time-Ordered correlators (OTOC) along parameter-scaling rays through the trained circuit, computing spacings between local minima, and standardizing them via a pre-fitted lognormal model. To probe finite-size effects, we sweep the number of qubits \(n\in \{4,6,8,10\}\) at fixed depth \(p=2\) and train two models on a balanced 1,000-sample MNIST subset: a StandardHybrid using the \(n\) local Pauli- \(Z\) expectations, and a ChaosAwareHybrid which appends the OTOC-derived scalar. We perform multi-run, 5-fold cross-validation with a paired design (identical seeds/folds across models) and report mean±SD, paired mean differences \(\Delta\) , 95% t- and bootstrap CIs, exact permutation/sign tests, win-rates (Wilson 95% CI), and paired effect sizes. Across \(N_\text {pairs}=\{50,50,67,50\}\) for \(n=\{4,6,8,10\}\) , the chaos-aware variant significantly improves test accuracy at \(n\in \{4,6,8\}\) with \(\Delta \approx +0.016\) \(+0.018\) , all 95% CIs excluding zero, permutation \(p\approx 0\) , high win-rates (86–100%), and large paired effects ( \(d_z\approx 1.0\) –2.3). At \(n=10\) the effect reverses ( \(\Delta =-0.022\) , 2% win-rate, \(d_z=-2.20\) ), indicating over-sensitivity. The best average accuracy occurs at \(n=8\) ( \(0.9006\pm 0.0069\) ; \(\Delta =+0.0180\) ; 100% wins). Per-epoch panels (train/val/test; mean±1 SD) reveal a “Goldilocks” width at which expressivity and sensitivity are balanced. These results show that a calibrated chaos diagnostic can enhance hybrid quantum–classical classifiers in resource-limited regimes and provide a principled knob to match circuit expressivity to many-body sensitivity.