Scholarlink

<p>This paper develops a cooperative game-theoretic methodology to measure a footballer’s relevance to team play by combining structural information–the network of completed passes–with individual performance data. This integration is the core of our methodological contribution. Using this information and the Shapley value concept from game theory, we propose four relevance measures (based on the Shapley value) that quantify each player’s relevance in a given match. We then apply the methodology to Argentina’s seven matches at the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar. Our results illustrate how the method can reveal players whose structural importance may not be captured by standard performance metrics (such as individual ratings) or standard centrality measures, providing complementary insights. Furthermore, the methodology is flexible, allowing analysts to tailor it to emphasize alternative tactical hypotheses and making it adaptable for team self-analysis, opponent preparation, and scouting.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluating player relevance in football teams through cooperative game theory

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月28日

查看全文
  • Eduardo Zúñiga-Leyton,
  • Luis Cornejo,
  • Verónica Díaz,
  • Fernando Feres,
  • Renny Márquez

摘要

This paper develops a cooperative game-theoretic methodology to measure a footballer’s relevance to team play by combining structural information–the network of completed passes–with individual performance data. This integration is the core of our methodological contribution. Using this information and the Shapley value concept from game theory, we propose four relevance measures (based on the Shapley value) that quantify each player’s relevance in a given match. We then apply the methodology to Argentina’s seven matches at the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar. Our results illustrate how the method can reveal players whose structural importance may not be captured by standard performance metrics (such as individual ratings) or standard centrality measures, providing complementary insights. Furthermore, the methodology is flexible, allowing analysts to tailor it to emphasize alternative tactical hypotheses and making it adaptable for team self-analysis, opponent preparation, and scouting.