Scholarlink

<p>Geopolymer concrete (GPC) became the substitute for conventional Portland cement-based concrete in recent years. In this work, fly ash (FA) and sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA) are used to create geopolymer concrete. The percentages of fly ash replacement with SBA at 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%, respectively, are indicated by the designations FS0, FS10, FS20, FS30, FS40, and FS50. Whereas FS0 indicates the traditional mix with no fly ash replacement, FS50 indicates a 50% replacement of fly ash. Compressive strength, flexural strength, and split tensile strength were among the mechanical characteristics that were tested. At 12&#xa0;M NaOH, the geopolymer concrete FS30 had compressive strengths of 46.88&#xa0;MPa after 28 days. This effect is consistent with fly ash’s geopolymerization reaction, which helps to generate more binding phases and produces denser and stronger concrete. Random forest (RF) algorithm demonstrated the most robust performance, achieving strong testing R² values of 0.8368, 0.7861, and 0.8199 for compressive, flexural, and split tensile strength, respectively. In contrast, the XGBoost model was, evidenced by its near-perfect training R² scores of approximately 0.9999, which plummeted to significantly lower testing R² values of 0.7378, 0.7136, and 0.7140 for the three strength properties. Similarly, the ANN also showed with high training R² values around 0.94, but a poor ability to generalize, resulting in considerably lower testing R² values of 0.4836, 0.5199, and 0.5424.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Mechanical properties analysis of geopolymer concrete based on the sugarcane bagasse ash using machine learning

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月22日

查看全文
  • Bheem Pratap,
  • Sanjeev Kumar,
  • Keerat Kumar Gupta,
  • Narala Gangadhara Reddy,
  • Abu Rashid,
  • Perumal Asaithambi,
  • Shankar Karuppannan

摘要

Geopolymer concrete (GPC) became the substitute for conventional Portland cement-based concrete in recent years. In this work, fly ash (FA) and sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA) are used to create geopolymer concrete. The percentages of fly ash replacement with SBA at 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%, respectively, are indicated by the designations FS0, FS10, FS20, FS30, FS40, and FS50. Whereas FS0 indicates the traditional mix with no fly ash replacement, FS50 indicates a 50% replacement of fly ash. Compressive strength, flexural strength, and split tensile strength were among the mechanical characteristics that were tested. At 12 M NaOH, the geopolymer concrete FS30 had compressive strengths of 46.88 MPa after 28 days. This effect is consistent with fly ash’s geopolymerization reaction, which helps to generate more binding phases and produces denser and stronger concrete. Random forest (RF) algorithm demonstrated the most robust performance, achieving strong testing R² values of 0.8368, 0.7861, and 0.8199 for compressive, flexural, and split tensile strength, respectively. In contrast, the XGBoost model was, evidenced by its near-perfect training R² scores of approximately 0.9999, which plummeted to significantly lower testing R² values of 0.7378, 0.7136, and 0.7140 for the three strength properties. Similarly, the ANN also showed with high training R² values around 0.94, but a poor ability to generalize, resulting in considerably lower testing R² values of 0.4836, 0.5199, and 0.5424.