Scholarlink

<p>Sperm preparation media used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) laboratories typically contain single or combined buffers to maintain pH and support spermatozoa homeostasis. Concerns exist that zwitterionic buffers, such as 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine ethane sulfonic acid (HEPES) and 3-(N-morpholino) propane sulfonic acid (MOPS), may negatively affect intrinsic cellular functions. Hence, this prospective study evaluated the impact of various buffers on sperm selection by swim up from fifty-four sub-fertile men, which were then divided into normozoospermic samples (<i>n</i> = 27) and non-normozoospermic (<i>n</i> = 27) cohorts. Each ejaculate was split into six aliquots, and swim-up was performed with media buffered by bicarbonate, HEPES, MOPS, bicarbonate + HEPES, or bicarbonate + MOPS. Post-swim-up spermatozoa were assessed for motility, morphology, kinematics, acrosome reaction, mitochondrial integrity, and DNA damage. Bicarbonate-buffered medium yielded spermatozoa with significantly higher motility and mitochondrial activity in both normozoospermic and non-normozoospermic samples (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In contrast, media containing HEPES or MOPS were associated with reduced motility (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), compromised sperm kinematic parameters (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), and diminished mitochondrial potential (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The study findings highlight the importance of bicarbonate buffer over zwitterionic buffers in sperm preparation media for the selection of better spermatozoa during ART procedures.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Bicarbonate buffer enhances functional sperm selection compared to Zwitterionic buffers in sperm preparation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月18日

查看全文
  • Huidrom Yaiphaba Meitei,
  • Dhakshanya Predheepan,
  • Shubhashree Uppangala,
  • Vani Lakshmi R,
  • Guruprasad Kalthur,
  • Stefan Schlatt,
  • Satish Kumar Adiga

摘要

Sperm preparation media used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) laboratories typically contain single or combined buffers to maintain pH and support spermatozoa homeostasis. Concerns exist that zwitterionic buffers, such as 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine ethane sulfonic acid (HEPES) and 3-(N-morpholino) propane sulfonic acid (MOPS), may negatively affect intrinsic cellular functions. Hence, this prospective study evaluated the impact of various buffers on sperm selection by swim up from fifty-four sub-fertile men, which were then divided into normozoospermic samples (n = 27) and non-normozoospermic (n = 27) cohorts. Each ejaculate was split into six aliquots, and swim-up was performed with media buffered by bicarbonate, HEPES, MOPS, bicarbonate + HEPES, or bicarbonate + MOPS. Post-swim-up spermatozoa were assessed for motility, morphology, kinematics, acrosome reaction, mitochondrial integrity, and DNA damage. Bicarbonate-buffered medium yielded spermatozoa with significantly higher motility and mitochondrial activity in both normozoospermic and non-normozoospermic samples (p < 0.001). In contrast, media containing HEPES or MOPS were associated with reduced motility (p < 0.001), compromised sperm kinematic parameters (p < 0.05), and diminished mitochondrial potential (p < 0.05). The study findings highlight the importance of bicarbonate buffer over zwitterionic buffers in sperm preparation media for the selection of better spermatozoa during ART procedures.