<p>Air pollution, particularly Nitrogen Dioxide (<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) and ground-level ozone (<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {O}_3\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), poses major risks to human health and the environment, making accurate forecasting essential for effective public health management. This paper compares several machine learning and deep learning models including Decision Trees, Random Forests, Support Vector Regression, Convolutional Neural Networks, Long Short-Term Memory networks, Prophet, and Transformers, for prediction of <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {O}_3\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> levels in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Model performance is evaluated using symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (sMAPE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) across forecasting horizons of 1 hour, 2 hours, 1 day, and 1 week. We find that Transformers yielded best results, with average sMAPE values ranging from 0.2354–0.2981 for <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and 0.2030–0.2719 for <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {O}_3\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Convolutional Neural Network is the second-best performer for short- and medium-forecasts, while Prophet is second-best for longer horizons. We also observe improved prediction accuracy when the inter-pollutant correlations between <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {O}_3\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are considered, particularly for 1-hour <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and 1- to 24-hour <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {O}_3\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> forecasts. These findings highlight the superiority of Transformer models and the benefits of incorporating pollutant coexistence effects in air quality forecasting.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Multi-model forecasting of \(\text {NO}_{2}\) and \(\text {O}_{3}\) in Abu Dhabi: benefits of correlation-based feature augmentation

  • Waad Abuouelezz,
  • Nazar Ali,
  • Zeyar Aung,
  • Ahmed Altunaiji,
  • Shaik Basheeruddin Shah,
  • Mansour Alkatheeri

摘要

Air pollution, particularly Nitrogen Dioxide ( \(\text {NO}_2\) ) and ground-level ozone ( \(\text {O}_3\) ), poses major risks to human health and the environment, making accurate forecasting essential for effective public health management. This paper compares several machine learning and deep learning models including Decision Trees, Random Forests, Support Vector Regression, Convolutional Neural Networks, Long Short-Term Memory networks, Prophet, and Transformers, for prediction of \(\text {NO}_2\) and \(\text {O}_3\) levels in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Model performance is evaluated using symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (sMAPE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) across forecasting horizons of 1 hour, 2 hours, 1 day, and 1 week. We find that Transformers yielded best results, with average sMAPE values ranging from 0.2354–0.2981 for \(\text {NO}_2\) and 0.2030–0.2719 for \(\text {O}_3\) . Convolutional Neural Network is the second-best performer for short- and medium-forecasts, while Prophet is second-best for longer horizons. We also observe improved prediction accuracy when the inter-pollutant correlations between \(\text {NO}_2\) and \(\text {O}_3\) are considered, particularly for 1-hour \(\text {NO}_2\) and 1- to 24-hour \(\text {O}_3\) forecasts. These findings highlight the superiority of Transformer models and the benefits of incorporating pollutant coexistence effects in air quality forecasting.