Scholarlink

<p>This study was to compare the biomechanical outcomes of three ACL graft tibial fixations. Biomechanical testing was performed on 36 fresh porcine tibias and flexor profundus tendon divided into three groups: interference screw group (<i>n</i> = 12), internal brace group (<i>n</i> = 12) and combined group (<i>n</i> = 12). The samples underwent cyclic loading at 1&#xa0;Hz at 50–250&#xa0;N for 1000 cycles, following by load-to-failure testing (200&#xa0;mm/min). The cyclic displacement, stiffness and ultimate failure loads were compared between the techniques. No sample failed during cyclic load test. The mean periodic displacement of the combined group (1.97 ± 0.32&#xa0;mm)was significantly lower than both the internal brace group (2.85 ± 0.43&#xa0;mm; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and interference screw group (2.48 ± 0.31&#xa0;mm; <i>p</i>&lt;0.05), but there was no significant difference between two fixation alone groups. The mean failure load of combined fixation (821.71 ± 78.39&#xa0;N) was higher than that with interference screw (631.97 ± 109.96&#xa0;N; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) or internal brace (566.04 ± 57.68&#xa0;N; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01) fixation alone. The combined group showed greater pullout stiffness (217.79 ± 36.66&#xa0;N/mm) than both the interference screw (151.69 ± 30.28&#xa0;N/mm; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and internal brace (162.94 ± 35.42&#xa0;N/mm; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) groups. Through biomechanical analysis, this study has demonstrated the feasibility of the soft tissue grafts fixed with internal brace and interference screw and its superiority in terms of higher ultimate failure load and stiffness compared to those fixed alone for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The findings from this study have significant implications for enhancing ACL reconstruction surgery.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Internal brace augmentation in ACL reconstruction increases structural strength and stiffness: a biomechanical study in a porcine tibia model

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月29日

查看全文
  • Siqi Chen,
  • Junyuan Wang,
  • Junhua You,
  • Wenxuan Li,
  • Yuhang Lv,
  • Hangzhou Zhang

摘要

This study was to compare the biomechanical outcomes of three ACL graft tibial fixations. Biomechanical testing was performed on 36 fresh porcine tibias and flexor profundus tendon divided into three groups: interference screw group (n = 12), internal brace group (n = 12) and combined group (n = 12). The samples underwent cyclic loading at 1 Hz at 50–250 N for 1000 cycles, following by load-to-failure testing (200 mm/min). The cyclic displacement, stiffness and ultimate failure loads were compared between the techniques. No sample failed during cyclic load test. The mean periodic displacement of the combined group (1.97 ± 0.32 mm)was significantly lower than both the internal brace group (2.85 ± 0.43 mm; p < 0.05) and interference screw group (2.48 ± 0.31 mm; p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between two fixation alone groups. The mean failure load of combined fixation (821.71 ± 78.39 N) was higher than that with interference screw (631.97 ± 109.96 N; p < 0.01) or internal brace (566.04 ± 57.68 N; P < 0.01) fixation alone. The combined group showed greater pullout stiffness (217.79 ± 36.66 N/mm) than both the interference screw (151.69 ± 30.28 N/mm; p < 0.01) and internal brace (162.94 ± 35.42 N/mm; p < 0.01) groups. Through biomechanical analysis, this study has demonstrated the feasibility of the soft tissue grafts fixed with internal brace and interference screw and its superiority in terms of higher ultimate failure load and stiffness compared to those fixed alone for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The findings from this study have significant implications for enhancing ACL reconstruction surgery.