Automatic detecting multiple bone metastases in breast cancer using deep learning based on low-resolution bone scan images
摘要
Whole-body bone scan (WBS) is usually used as the effective diagnostic method for early-stage and comprehensive bone metastases of breast cancer. WBS images with breast cancer bone metastasis have the characteristics of low resolution, small foreground, and multiple lesions, hindering the widespread application of deep learning-based models. Automatically detecting a large number of densely small lesions on low-resolution WBS images remains a challenge. We aim to develop a unified framework for detecting multiple densely bone metastases based on low-resolution WBS images. We propose a novel unified detection framework to detect multiple bone metastases based on WBS images. Considering the difficulties of feature extraction caused by low resolution and multiple lesions, we innovatively propose the plug-and-play position auxiliary extraction module and feature fusion module to enhance the ability of global information extraction. In order to accurately detect small metastases in WBS, we designed the self-attention transformer-based target detection head. This retrospective study included 512 patients with breast cancer bone metastases from Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The data type is whole-body bone scan image. For our study, the ratio of training set, validation set and test set is about 6:2:2. The benchmarks are four representative baselines, SSD, YOLOR, Faster_RCNN_R and Scaled-YOLOv4. The performance metrics are Average Precision (AP), Precision and Recall. The detection results obtained through the proposed method were assessed using the Bonferroni-adjusted Wilcoxon rank test. The significant level is adjusted according to different multiple comparisons. We conducted extensive experiments and ablation studies on a private dataset of breast cancer WBS and a public dataset of bone scans from West China Hospital to validate the effectiveness and generalization. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of our method. First, compared to different network architectures, our method obtained AP of 55.0 ± 6.4% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 49.9–60.1%,