Scholarlink

<p>Perforated appendicitis (PA) is the most common cause of intra-abdominal abscess in children and is associated with higher costs, extended hospitalizations, and worse postoperative outcomes compared to uncomplicated appendicitis. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) utilizes a photosensitizer and light to generate cytotoxic reactive species that are efficacious against bacteria. We sought to determine whether PDT could effectively eliminate bacteria isolated from the peritoneal cavities of pediatric patients with perforated appendicitis. After IRB approval, bacterial subcultures from 30 pediatric surgical patients with PA were developed as planktonic monocultures. Samples were derived from standard clinical collection of peritoneal fluid in patients undergoing surgery for PA. Cultures were incubated with the photosensitizer methylene blue (MB) and exposed to a 665&#xa0;nm laser to perform PDT. Control conditions were MB alone, laser alone, or no MB and no laser. Log reductions in bacterial growth between groups were compared using two-way ANOVA. Bacteria were isolated from 28 (93.3%) specimens, and 26 (86.7%) were polymicrobial. The most prevalent organisms included <i>Escherichia coli</i> (76.7%), the <i>Streptococcus anginosus</i> group (56.7%), <i>Bacteroides fragilis</i> (46.6%), and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (26.7%), with antibiotic resistance common among E. <i>coli</i> isolates. For <i>E. coli</i>, MB-PDT caused a 5.86 ± 0.39 log<sub>10</sub> reduction compared to the no-treatment control (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). For <i>S. anginosus</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i>, MB-PDT resulted in reductions of 5.91 ± 0.88 log<sub>10</sub> and 2.23 ± 0.64 log<sub>10</sub>, respectively (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). PDT showed comparable efficacy in isolates with multiple antibiotic resistance relative to those that were antibiotic pan-susceptible for <i>E. coli</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.760), <i>S. anginosus</i> group (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.999), and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.991). PDT application to bacterial isolates from patients with perforated appendicitis achieved &gt; 99.9% bacterial kill in all isolated strains other than <i>P. aeruginosa</i>, regardless of antibiotic susceptibility, suggesting that PDT may be a viable adjunct to in vivo antimicrobial therapy.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Photodynamic therapy with methylene blue effectively kills antibiotic resistant bacteria from pediatric patients with perforated appendicitis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月10日

查看全文
  • Korry T. Wirth,
  • Eric Y. Wang,
  • Darrian S. Hawryluk,
  • Matthew M. Byrne,
  • Marjorie J. Arca,
  • Derek S. Wakeman,
  • Walter Pegoli Jr.,
  • David G. Darcy,
  • Martin S. Pavelka Jr.,
  • Nicole A. Wilson,
  • Timothy M. Baran

摘要

Perforated appendicitis (PA) is the most common cause of intra-abdominal abscess in children and is associated with higher costs, extended hospitalizations, and worse postoperative outcomes compared to uncomplicated appendicitis. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) utilizes a photosensitizer and light to generate cytotoxic reactive species that are efficacious against bacteria. We sought to determine whether PDT could effectively eliminate bacteria isolated from the peritoneal cavities of pediatric patients with perforated appendicitis. After IRB approval, bacterial subcultures from 30 pediatric surgical patients with PA were developed as planktonic monocultures. Samples were derived from standard clinical collection of peritoneal fluid in patients undergoing surgery for PA. Cultures were incubated with the photosensitizer methylene blue (MB) and exposed to a 665 nm laser to perform PDT. Control conditions were MB alone, laser alone, or no MB and no laser. Log reductions in bacterial growth between groups were compared using two-way ANOVA. Bacteria were isolated from 28 (93.3%) specimens, and 26 (86.7%) were polymicrobial. The most prevalent organisms included Escherichia coli (76.7%), the Streptococcus anginosus group (56.7%), Bacteroides fragilis (46.6%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (26.7%), with antibiotic resistance common among E. coli isolates. For E. coli, MB-PDT caused a 5.86 ± 0.39 log10 reduction compared to the no-treatment control (p < 0.001). For S. anginosus and P. aeruginosa, MB-PDT resulted in reductions of 5.91 ± 0.88 log10 and 2.23 ± 0.64 log10, respectively (all p < 0.001). PDT showed comparable efficacy in isolates with multiple antibiotic resistance relative to those that were antibiotic pan-susceptible for E. coli (p = 0.760), S. anginosus group (p > 0.999), and P. aeruginosa (p = 0.991). PDT application to bacterial isolates from patients with perforated appendicitis achieved > 99.9% bacterial kill in all isolated strains other than P. aeruginosa, regardless of antibiotic susceptibility, suggesting that PDT may be a viable adjunct to in vivo antimicrobial therapy.