Scholarlink

<p>This report examines the implementation of the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework in various educational settings, with a focus on accessibility modifications and their impact on learning outcomes. A mixed-methods longitudinal approach was employed to gather data from 2,473 learners across 87 educational facilities. Assessing the extent to which the UDL framework encourages more inclusive and adaptive instructional designs, the framework supports flexible learning environments that prioritize embracing more inclusive and adaptive instructional approaches. The study found that institutions that fully engaged all three UDL framework principles, means of engagement, representation, and action/expression, recorded an increase of 37.4% in overall learner performance and 42.8% in the performance of disengaged learners. The study found a significant relationship between UDL implementation and positive outcome differences (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) in UDL performance principles, which was substantially more pronounced in the case of engaged learners than in disengaged learners. Empirical evidence suggests that five critical factors, as revealed by qualitative data, facilitate successful integration: strong administrative support, ongoing professional development, comprehensive technology availability, collaborative pedagogy, and flexible data use. These empirically validated routes of action assist the application of UDL principles and broaden the integration of equitable access within the educational field. Within the context of participating institutions, UDL integration was associated with improved educational environments and appeared to increase access for students experiencing participation barriers. These findings suggest that flexible, inclusive UDL approaches may support improved access and attainment across diverse student populations in settings with adequate implementation support, though further research is needed to confirm generalizability across different educational contexts and timeframes.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Implementation fidelity of universal design for learning and effects on student achievement engagement and belonging

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月26日

查看全文
  • Pu Guo,
  • Zeyu Wang

摘要

This report examines the implementation of the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework in various educational settings, with a focus on accessibility modifications and their impact on learning outcomes. A mixed-methods longitudinal approach was employed to gather data from 2,473 learners across 87 educational facilities. Assessing the extent to which the UDL framework encourages more inclusive and adaptive instructional designs, the framework supports flexible learning environments that prioritize embracing more inclusive and adaptive instructional approaches. The study found that institutions that fully engaged all three UDL framework principles, means of engagement, representation, and action/expression, recorded an increase of 37.4% in overall learner performance and 42.8% in the performance of disengaged learners. The study found a significant relationship between UDL implementation and positive outcome differences (p < 0.001) in UDL performance principles, which was substantially more pronounced in the case of engaged learners than in disengaged learners. Empirical evidence suggests that five critical factors, as revealed by qualitative data, facilitate successful integration: strong administrative support, ongoing professional development, comprehensive technology availability, collaborative pedagogy, and flexible data use. These empirically validated routes of action assist the application of UDL principles and broaden the integration of equitable access within the educational field. Within the context of participating institutions, UDL integration was associated with improved educational environments and appeared to increase access for students experiencing participation barriers. These findings suggest that flexible, inclusive UDL approaches may support improved access and attainment across diverse student populations in settings with adequate implementation support, though further research is needed to confirm generalizability across different educational contexts and timeframes.