<p>Prostate cancer is characterized by an immunosuppressive tumour environment. This work combines Raman spectroscopy with group-and-bases-restricted non-negative matrix factorization (GBR-NMF) and machine learning to assemble models of immune cell densities within the needle-core biopsies of patients undergoing high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Raman spectral acquisition, as well as immunohistochemistry staining of CD68<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="11" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^+\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, CD3<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="11" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^+\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="43" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {CD8}^+\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> cells, was completed for biopsies collected before and 2 weeks following the first fraction of HDR-BT. Regression techniques, constructed using GBR-NMF scores, that produced the most accurate predictions of immune cell density by metrics of root mean-squared error (RMSE) and R<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="8" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{2}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> were the gradient-boosted trees model of <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="111" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {CD68}^{+}\hbox {+ CD3}^{+}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> density (RMSE: 163 counts<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="22" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="43" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {/mm}^2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {R}^{2}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>: 0.65) and the elastic net model of <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="51" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {CD68}^{+}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>/ <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="43" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {CD8}^{+}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (RMSE: 0.25, <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {R}^{2}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>: 0.82). The accuracy of these models, herein defined as the fraction of patient predictions within <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq11.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="24" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\pm 1\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> standard deviation of their measured values was 11/16 and 12/16, for CD68<InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq12.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="24" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{+}+\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> CD3<InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq13.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="11" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{+}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and CD68<InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq13.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="11" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{+}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>/ CD8<InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq13.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="11" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{+}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> models, respectively. To further delineate which metabolites were most important in the CD68<InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq13.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="11" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{+}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>/ CD8<InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="11" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^+\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> model, this ratio was further predicted in stromal and epithelial tissues within the biopsies, and resulting models utilized the GBR-NMF scores of glutathione, collagen, palmitic acid, and the pre- or post-HDR-BT label to produce an optimal performance level according to RMSE and R<InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_20107_Article_IEq18.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="8" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In summary, this study illustrates a novel methodology in which supervised machine learning techniques are used to model immune cells, which are prognostic indicators of disease progression.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Modelling of immune infiltration in prostate cancer treated with HDR-brachytherapy using Raman spectroscopy and machine learning

  • Sandra N. Popescu,
  • Kirsty Milligan,
  • Mitchell Wiebe,
  • Alejandra Fuentes,
  • Joan M. Brewer,
  • Christina K. Haston,
  • Julian J. Lum,
  • Samantha Punch,
  • Alejandra Raudales,
  • Alexandre G. Brolo,
  • Juanita M. Crook,
  • Jeffrey L. Andrews,
  • Andrew Jirasek

摘要

Prostate cancer is characterized by an immunosuppressive tumour environment. This work combines Raman spectroscopy with group-and-bases-restricted non-negative matrix factorization (GBR-NMF) and machine learning to assemble models of immune cell densities within the needle-core biopsies of patients undergoing high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Raman spectral acquisition, as well as immunohistochemistry staining of CD68 \(^+\) , CD3 \(^+\) , and \(\hbox {CD8}^+\) cells, was completed for biopsies collected before and 2 weeks following the first fraction of HDR-BT. Regression techniques, constructed using GBR-NMF scores, that produced the most accurate predictions of immune cell density by metrics of root mean-squared error (RMSE) and R \(^{2}\) were the gradient-boosted trees model of \(\hbox {CD68}^{+}\hbox {+ CD3}^{+}\) density (RMSE: 163 counts \(\hbox {/mm}^2\) , \(\hbox {R}^{2}\) : 0.65) and the elastic net model of \(\hbox {CD68}^{+}\) / \(\hbox {CD8}^{+}\) (RMSE: 0.25, \(\hbox {R}^{2}\) : 0.82). The accuracy of these models, herein defined as the fraction of patient predictions within \(\pm 1\) standard deviation of their measured values was 11/16 and 12/16, for CD68 \(^{+}+\) CD3 \(^{+}\) and CD68 \(^{+}\) / CD8 \(^{+}\) models, respectively. To further delineate which metabolites were most important in the CD68 \(^{+}\) / CD8 \(^+\) model, this ratio was further predicted in stromal and epithelial tissues within the biopsies, and resulting models utilized the GBR-NMF scores of glutathione, collagen, palmitic acid, and the pre- or post-HDR-BT label to produce an optimal performance level according to RMSE and R \(^2\) . In summary, this study illustrates a novel methodology in which supervised machine learning techniques are used to model immune cells, which are prognostic indicators of disease progression.