<p>This study presents a hybrid modeling framework for predicting proppant settling rate (PSR) in hydraulic fracturing by integrating symbolic physics-based derivations, parametric simulations, and ensemble machine learning. Symbolic expressions were formulated using Stokes’ law, drag equations, and pressure-gradient dynamics. A symbolic dataset was synthetically generated by sampling realistic physical ranges: proppant density <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15837_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="165" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _p \in [2500, 3500]\,\mathrm {kg/m^3}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, fluid viscosity <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15837_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="178" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu \in [0.0008, 0.0012]\,\mathrm {Pa\cdot s}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and particle diameter <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15837_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="164" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(d_p \in [0.0005, 0.0010]\,~\textrm{m}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Complementary CFD-informed datasets were simulated to represent complex flow behavior. Both datasets were used to train stacked ensemble regressors comprising five base learners: Random Forest, Extra Trees, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and Support Vector Regression (SVR), combined with a RidgeCV meta-learner. Numerical analysis validated the physics consistency of the symbolic model. ODE-based simulations revealed terminal velocity of <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15837_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="6" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sim\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>0.39 m/s reached within 0.5 s, while parametric studies showed velocity reductions up to 40% for strain <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15837_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="51" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\epsilon = 0.1\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Pressure-gradient analysis showed a 45% reduction in settling depth as <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15837_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="29" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta P\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> increased from 0.1 to 1.0 bar/m. Model performance was evaluated across symbolic, CFD, and combined datasets. The symbolic model achieved R<InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15837_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="8" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.9934, RMSE = 0.0436; the CFD model yielded R<InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15837_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="8" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.9941, RMSE = 0.2033. The hybrid ensemble outperformed both with R<InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15837_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="8" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.9970, RMSE = 0.1801. This framework enables interpretable, accurate, and computationally efficient prediction of PSR, eliminating the need for full-scale CFD–DEM simulations. It is well-suited for decision support in multiscale fracture design and proppant transport analysis.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Machine learning-enhanced fully coupled fluid–solid interaction models for proppant dynamics in hydraulic fractures

  • Dennis Delali Kwesi Wayo,
  • Sonny Irawan,
  • Lei Wang,
  • Leonardo Goliatt

摘要

This study presents a hybrid modeling framework for predicting proppant settling rate (PSR) in hydraulic fracturing by integrating symbolic physics-based derivations, parametric simulations, and ensemble machine learning. Symbolic expressions were formulated using Stokes’ law, drag equations, and pressure-gradient dynamics. A symbolic dataset was synthetically generated by sampling realistic physical ranges: proppant density \(\rho _p \in [2500, 3500]\,\mathrm {kg/m^3}\) , fluid viscosity \(\mu \in [0.0008, 0.0012]\,\mathrm {Pa\cdot s}\) , and particle diameter \(d_p \in [0.0005, 0.0010]\,~\textrm{m}\) . Complementary CFD-informed datasets were simulated to represent complex flow behavior. Both datasets were used to train stacked ensemble regressors comprising five base learners: Random Forest, Extra Trees, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and Support Vector Regression (SVR), combined with a RidgeCV meta-learner. Numerical analysis validated the physics consistency of the symbolic model. ODE-based simulations revealed terminal velocity of \(\sim\) 0.39 m/s reached within 0.5 s, while parametric studies showed velocity reductions up to 40% for strain \(\epsilon = 0.1\) . Pressure-gradient analysis showed a 45% reduction in settling depth as \(\Delta P\) increased from 0.1 to 1.0 bar/m. Model performance was evaluated across symbolic, CFD, and combined datasets. The symbolic model achieved R \(^2\) = 0.9934, RMSE = 0.0436; the CFD model yielded R \(^2\) = 0.9941, RMSE = 0.2033. The hybrid ensemble outperformed both with R \(^2\) = 0.9970, RMSE = 0.1801. This framework enables interpretable, accurate, and computationally efficient prediction of PSR, eliminating the need for full-scale CFD–DEM simulations. It is well-suited for decision support in multiscale fracture design and proppant transport analysis.