<p>Insects, vital for ecosystem stability, are declining globally necessitating improved monitoring methods. Trap-based approaches are labor-intensive, invasive, and limited in scope. This study therefore presents a novel, automated, non-invasive insect monitoring system that detects atmospheric electrical field modulations caused by flying insects. In-field sensors monitor insect activity and biomass without physical trapping, using differential electric field measurements and convolutional neural networks for detection and wing-beat frequency analysis. Furthermore, a biomass algorithm that estimates taxon-specific weights is introduced. To validate this method, paired sensor and Townes Malaise trap deployments were conducted at two sites in a Danish nature reserve. Results showed moderate to strong correlations between sensors and traps, particularly at one site (Spearman’s <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15613_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="70" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho =0.725\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for counts; 0.644 for biomass), supporting the method’s viability. A discrepancy in biomass estimates between methods, greater than that of counts, suggests the need for further refinement of the sensor’s biomass estimation. For inter-method consistency, sensor-sensor correlations (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15613_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="70" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho =0.758\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for counts; 0.867 for biomass) exceeded Malaise-Malaise correlations (<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15613_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="70" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho =0.597\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for counts; 0.641 for biomass), though not significantly so (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15613_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="73" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(P=0.304\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for counts; <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_15613_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="73" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(P=0.057\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for biomass). Overall, the study concludes that while further work is needed, this innovative approach shows promise for future insect monitoring and ecological research.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Automated insect detection and biomass monitoring via AI and electrical field sensor technology

  • Freja Balmer Odgaard,
  • Páll Vang Kjærbo,
  • Amir Hossein Poorjam,
  • Khaled Hechmi,
  • Rubens Monteiro Luciano,
  • Niels Krebs

摘要

Insects, vital for ecosystem stability, are declining globally necessitating improved monitoring methods. Trap-based approaches are labor-intensive, invasive, and limited in scope. This study therefore presents a novel, automated, non-invasive insect monitoring system that detects atmospheric electrical field modulations caused by flying insects. In-field sensors monitor insect activity and biomass without physical trapping, using differential electric field measurements and convolutional neural networks for detection and wing-beat frequency analysis. Furthermore, a biomass algorithm that estimates taxon-specific weights is introduced. To validate this method, paired sensor and Townes Malaise trap deployments were conducted at two sites in a Danish nature reserve. Results showed moderate to strong correlations between sensors and traps, particularly at one site (Spearman’s \(\rho =0.725\) for counts; 0.644 for biomass), supporting the method’s viability. A discrepancy in biomass estimates between methods, greater than that of counts, suggests the need for further refinement of the sensor’s biomass estimation. For inter-method consistency, sensor-sensor correlations ( \(\rho =0.758\) for counts; 0.867 for biomass) exceeded Malaise-Malaise correlations ( \(\rho =0.597\) for counts; 0.641 for biomass), though not significantly so ( \(P=0.304\) for counts; \(P=0.057\) for biomass). Overall, the study concludes that while further work is needed, this innovative approach shows promise for future insect monitoring and ecological research.