Scholarlink

<p>Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have made it possible to detect neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) earlier, potentially improving patient outcomes. However, AI-based detection tools remain underutilized. We studied individual valuation for early diagnosis tests for NDDs. We conducted a discrete choice experiment with a representative sample of the French adult population (<i>N</i> = 1017). Participants were asked to choose between early diagnosis tests that differed in terms of: (1) type of test (saliva vs. AI-based tests analysing electronic health records); (2) identity of the person communicating the test results; (3) sensitivity; (4) specificity; and (5) price. We calculated the weights in the decision for each attribute and examined how socio-demographic characteristics influenced them. Respondents revealed a reduced utility value when AI-based testing was involved (valuated at an average of €36.08, CI [€22.13; €50.89]) and when results were communicated by a private company (€95.15, CI [€82.01; €109.82]). We interpret these figures as the shadow price that the public attaches to medical data privacy. Beyond monetization, our representative sample of the French population appears reluctant to adopt AI-powered screening, particularly when performed on large sets of personal data. However, they would be more supportive when medical expertise is associated with the tests.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Public hesitancy for AI-based detection of neurodegenerative diseases in France

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月23日

查看全文
  • Ismaël Rafaï,
  • Bérengère Davin-Casalena,
  • Dimitri Dubois,
  • Thierry Blayac,
  • Bruno Ventelou

摘要

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have made it possible to detect neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) earlier, potentially improving patient outcomes. However, AI-based detection tools remain underutilized. We studied individual valuation for early diagnosis tests for NDDs. We conducted a discrete choice experiment with a representative sample of the French adult population (N = 1017). Participants were asked to choose between early diagnosis tests that differed in terms of: (1) type of test (saliva vs. AI-based tests analysing electronic health records); (2) identity of the person communicating the test results; (3) sensitivity; (4) specificity; and (5) price. We calculated the weights in the decision for each attribute and examined how socio-demographic characteristics influenced them. Respondents revealed a reduced utility value when AI-based testing was involved (valuated at an average of €36.08, CI [€22.13; €50.89]) and when results were communicated by a private company (€95.15, CI [€82.01; €109.82]). We interpret these figures as the shadow price that the public attaches to medical data privacy. Beyond monetization, our representative sample of the French population appears reluctant to adopt AI-powered screening, particularly when performed on large sets of personal data. However, they would be more supportive when medical expertise is associated with the tests.