<p>This study investigated the effects of three uphill gradients; shallow (SHG ~ 2.5%), intermediate (IHG ~ 5.1%), and steeper (STHG ~ 7.6%) on maximal velocity (Vmax), 800&#xa0;m time trial (TT), and strength endurance (SE) performance in middle-distance runners. Forty moderately trained athletes (aged 16–20) were randomly assigned to SHG, IHG, STHG, or control (CG) groups (<i>n</i> = 10 each). Over 8 weeks, participants completed gradient-specific training. Vmax (30&#xa0;m sprint), TT (800&#xa0;m), and SE (1-min burpees) were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Two-way RM-ANOVA revealed significant main effects on Vmax (F(3,36) = 2.87, <i>p</i> = .049, <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_8275_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="22" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="22" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:{\eta\:}_{p}^{2}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.20), TT (F(3,36) = 7.60, <i>p</i> &lt; .001, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_8275_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="22" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="22" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:{\eta\:}_{p}^{2}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.39), and SE (F(3,36) = 5.19, <i>p</i> = .004, <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_8275_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="22" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="22" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:{\eta\:}_{p}^{2}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.30). Post-hoc analysis showed STHG significantly outperformed CG in Vmax (mΔ = 0.93, <i>p</i> = .040), TT (mΔ = -0.29, <i>p</i> = .001), and SE (mΔ = 3.90, <i>p</i> = .007). IHG also improved TT vs. CG (mΔ = − 0.25, <i>p</i> = .007). The finding revealed that, uphill training, particularly steeper gradients, significantly enhances speed, endurance, and running performances. Therefore, coaches and athletes should customize training programs using uphill while carefully matching the strengths and weaknesses of the athlete and the demands of the event.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The effects of uphill training on the maximal velocity and performance of middle-distance runners: a randomized controlled trial

  • Yehualaw Alemu,
  • Tefera Tadesse,
  • Zerihun Birhanu

摘要

This study investigated the effects of three uphill gradients; shallow (SHG ~ 2.5%), intermediate (IHG ~ 5.1%), and steeper (STHG ~ 7.6%) on maximal velocity (Vmax), 800 m time trial (TT), and strength endurance (SE) performance in middle-distance runners. Forty moderately trained athletes (aged 16–20) were randomly assigned to SHG, IHG, STHG, or control (CG) groups (n = 10 each). Over 8 weeks, participants completed gradient-specific training. Vmax (30 m sprint), TT (800 m), and SE (1-min burpees) were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Two-way RM-ANOVA revealed significant main effects on Vmax (F(3,36) = 2.87, p = .049, \(\:{\eta\:}_{p}^{2}\) = 0.20), TT (F(3,36) = 7.60, p < .001, \(\:{\eta\:}_{p}^{2}\) = 0.39), and SE (F(3,36) = 5.19, p = .004, \(\:{\eta\:}_{p}^{2}\) = 0.30). Post-hoc analysis showed STHG significantly outperformed CG in Vmax (mΔ = 0.93, p = .040), TT (mΔ = -0.29, p = .001), and SE (mΔ = 3.90, p = .007). IHG also improved TT vs. CG (mΔ = − 0.25, p = .007). The finding revealed that, uphill training, particularly steeper gradients, significantly enhances speed, endurance, and running performances. Therefore, coaches and athletes should customize training programs using uphill while carefully matching the strengths and weaknesses of the athlete and the demands of the event.