Scholarlink

<p>Hydrological models are an effective tool for the estimation of peak floods and runoff in planning water development and flood mitigation/adaptation. Continuous hydrologic modeling can determine the relationships between hydrologic processes and environmental changes over long time periods. Therefore, the selection of a theoretically robust and functionally reliable hydrological model is crucial for the effective management of flood risk within a basin. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is one of the most widely used hydrological models for assessing the impacts of climate change on discharge in large basins. In contrast, the Hydrologic Engineering Centers’ Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) has been one of the most rapidly evolving and promising hydrological models, with its latest version (v4.9) supporting both fully distributed and semidistributed hydrological modeling approaches. This study was conducted to compare the performances of SWAT and HEC-HMS in long-term continuous simulations in the Pearl River Basin, which is the second largest river basin in terms of discharge in China. For purposes of comparison, both models employed identical input data and comparable configurations. The results demonstrate that both models are capable of predicting river discharge at designated station satisfactories, with the Nash-Sutciffe coefficient exceeding 0.7. Benefiting from its elaborate use of the modified Soil Conservation Service (SCS) loss model and more advanced automatic calibration program, SWAT obtained more accurate results than HEC-HMS in the validation period. However, HEC-HMS is distinguished by its customizable options for constructing hydrological models, and it exhibits considerable potential for application in large-scale river basins such as the Pearl River Basin, enabling long-term, continuous hydrological simulations.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Performance of long-term continuous hydrological models in fluvial flow simulation in a large-scale river basin

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月1日

查看全文
  • Zhuo Zhang

摘要

Hydrological models are an effective tool for the estimation of peak floods and runoff in planning water development and flood mitigation/adaptation. Continuous hydrologic modeling can determine the relationships between hydrologic processes and environmental changes over long time periods. Therefore, the selection of a theoretically robust and functionally reliable hydrological model is crucial for the effective management of flood risk within a basin. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is one of the most widely used hydrological models for assessing the impacts of climate change on discharge in large basins. In contrast, the Hydrologic Engineering Centers’ Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) has been one of the most rapidly evolving and promising hydrological models, with its latest version (v4.9) supporting both fully distributed and semidistributed hydrological modeling approaches. This study was conducted to compare the performances of SWAT and HEC-HMS in long-term continuous simulations in the Pearl River Basin, which is the second largest river basin in terms of discharge in China. For purposes of comparison, both models employed identical input data and comparable configurations. The results demonstrate that both models are capable of predicting river discharge at designated station satisfactories, with the Nash-Sutciffe coefficient exceeding 0.7. Benefiting from its elaborate use of the modified Soil Conservation Service (SCS) loss model and more advanced automatic calibration program, SWAT obtained more accurate results than HEC-HMS in the validation period. However, HEC-HMS is distinguished by its customizable options for constructing hydrological models, and it exhibits considerable potential for application in large-scale river basins such as the Pearl River Basin, enabling long-term, continuous hydrological simulations.