Scholarlink

<p>Nearly a third of TB cases go undetected annually. WHO recommends computer-aided detection (CAD) to enhance TB screening, with studies showing comparable performance to local radiologists. Using 774 chest X-rays from the South African National TB Prevalence Survey, we compared 12 CAD software with 11 radiologists from Nigeria, India, the UK, and the US, against a composite microbiological reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity and Cohen’s kappa were calculated. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were developed for CAD and Euclidean distance assessed radiologists’ alignment with the best-performing software. Binomial regression tested the impact of radiologists’ characteristics on accuracy. Radiologist performance varied. On the restricted read, British radiologists had the highest sensitivity (78.7% [73.2–83.5%]) and Indian radiologists the lowest (67.1% [61.0–72.8%]). Specificity ranged from 75.8% (71.8–79.4%, Nigeria) to 84.3% (80.9–87.3%, the US). Radiologist performance was significantly impacted by HIV, prior TB, and age. The top CAD outperformed all except Indian radiologists when matching specificity. CAD with <i>Conformité Européenne</i> generally matched or surpassed radiologists. British radiologists’ sensitivity was closest to the top CAD, while American radiologists were closest in specificity and overall. Experience, TB reads, and country had no significant impact on accuracy. CAD performed well against radiologists globally, highlighting potential to enhance access to care.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparing the accuracy of computer-aided detection (CAD) software and radiologists from multiple countries for tuberculosis detection in chest X-Rays

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月2日

查看全文
  • Zhi Zhen Qin,
  • Martie Van der Walt,
  • Sizulu Moyo,
  • Farzana Ismail,
  • Phaleng Maribe,
  • Claudia M. Denkinger,
  • Sarah Zaidi,
  • Rachael Barrett,
  • Lindiwe Mvusi,
  • Yolisa Tsibolane,
  • Nkateko Mkhondo,
  • Khangelani Zuma,
  • Samuel Manda,
  • Lisa Koeppel,
  • Thuli Mthiyane,
  • Jacob Creswell

摘要

Nearly a third of TB cases go undetected annually. WHO recommends computer-aided detection (CAD) to enhance TB screening, with studies showing comparable performance to local radiologists. Using 774 chest X-rays from the South African National TB Prevalence Survey, we compared 12 CAD software with 11 radiologists from Nigeria, India, the UK, and the US, against a composite microbiological reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity and Cohen’s kappa were calculated. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were developed for CAD and Euclidean distance assessed radiologists’ alignment with the best-performing software. Binomial regression tested the impact of radiologists’ characteristics on accuracy. Radiologist performance varied. On the restricted read, British radiologists had the highest sensitivity (78.7% [73.2–83.5%]) and Indian radiologists the lowest (67.1% [61.0–72.8%]). Specificity ranged from 75.8% (71.8–79.4%, Nigeria) to 84.3% (80.9–87.3%, the US). Radiologist performance was significantly impacted by HIV, prior TB, and age. The top CAD outperformed all except Indian radiologists when matching specificity. CAD with Conformité Européenne generally matched or surpassed radiologists. British radiologists’ sensitivity was closest to the top CAD, while American radiologists were closest in specificity and overall. Experience, TB reads, and country had no significant impact on accuracy. CAD performed well against radiologists globally, highlighting potential to enhance access to care.