Scholarlink

<p>Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) have been suggested as a viable solution to reduce sugar consumption. However, conflicting and uncertain evidence regarding their impact on lipid profile exists. This meta-analysis assesses the effects of different types of NNS on lipid profile markers. PubMed, Web of Science ISI, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles up to September 2024. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used for the quality assessment, and the evidence’s trustworthiness was assessed using the Grading of Assessment, Development, and Evaluation of Recommendations (GRADE). A total of 28 articles revealed that NNS might not have a significant effect on serum triglycerides (Weighted mean difference (WMD): -2.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): -6.29, 0.98&#xa0;mg/dL, <i>n</i> = 2209, level of confidence: low), total cholesterol (WMD: -0.44, 95% CI: -2.96, 2.08&#xa0;mg/dl, <i>n</i> = 2047, level of confidence: low), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD: 0.03, 95% CI: -0.68, 0.74&#xa0;mg/dl, <i>n</i> = 2097, level of confidence: low), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD: 0.51, 95% CI: -1.57, 2.59&#xa0;mg/dl, <i>n</i> = 1777, level of confidence: low) and very low-density lipoprotein (WMD: 2.20, 95% CI: -2.66, 7.06&#xa0;mg/dl, <i>n</i> = 154, level of confidence: very low). It is demonstrated that NNS might not affect serum lipid profile.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on lipid profile in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月1日

查看全文
  • AmirHossein Najafi,
  • Fatemeh Moghtaderi,
  • Behnaz Seyedjafari,
  • Kimia Rostampour,
  • Amin Salehi-Abargouei

摘要

Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) have been suggested as a viable solution to reduce sugar consumption. However, conflicting and uncertain evidence regarding their impact on lipid profile exists. This meta-analysis assesses the effects of different types of NNS on lipid profile markers. PubMed, Web of Science ISI, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles up to September 2024. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used for the quality assessment, and the evidence’s trustworthiness was assessed using the Grading of Assessment, Development, and Evaluation of Recommendations (GRADE). A total of 28 articles revealed that NNS might not have a significant effect on serum triglycerides (Weighted mean difference (WMD): -2.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): -6.29, 0.98 mg/dL, n = 2209, level of confidence: low), total cholesterol (WMD: -0.44, 95% CI: -2.96, 2.08 mg/dl, n = 2047, level of confidence: low), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD: 0.03, 95% CI: -0.68, 0.74 mg/dl, n = 2097, level of confidence: low), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD: 0.51, 95% CI: -1.57, 2.59 mg/dl, n = 1777, level of confidence: low) and very low-density lipoprotein (WMD: 2.20, 95% CI: -2.66, 7.06 mg/dl, n = 154, level of confidence: very low). It is demonstrated that NNS might not affect serum lipid profile.