<p>Meta-analysis enhances the power of rare variant association tests by combining summary statistics across several cohorts. However, existing methods often fail to control type I error for low-prevalence binary traits and are computationally intensive. Here we introduce Meta-SAIGE—a scalable method for rare variant meta-analysis that accurately estimates the null distribution to control type I error and reuses the linkage disequilibrium matrix across phenotypes to boost computational efficiency in phenome-wide analyses. Simulations using UK Biobank whole-exome sequencing data show that Meta-SAIGE effectively controls type I error and achieves power comparable to pooled individual-level analysis with SAIGE-GENE+. Applying Meta-SAIGE to 83 low-prevalence phenotypes in UK Biobank and All of Us whole-exome sequencing data identified 237 gene–trait associations. Notably, 80 of these associations were not significant in either dataset alone, underscoring the power of our meta-analysis.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Scalable and accurate rare variant meta-analysis with Meta-SAIGE

  • Eunjae Park,
  • Kisung Nam,
  • Seokho Jeong,
  • Karl Keat,
  • Dokyoon Kim,
  • Vikas Bansal,
  • Wei Zhou,
  • Seunggeun Lee

摘要

Meta-analysis enhances the power of rare variant association tests by combining summary statistics across several cohorts. However, existing methods often fail to control type I error for low-prevalence binary traits and are computationally intensive. Here we introduce Meta-SAIGE—a scalable method for rare variant meta-analysis that accurately estimates the null distribution to control type I error and reuses the linkage disequilibrium matrix across phenotypes to boost computational efficiency in phenome-wide analyses. Simulations using UK Biobank whole-exome sequencing data show that Meta-SAIGE effectively controls type I error and achieves power comparable to pooled individual-level analysis with SAIGE-GENE+. Applying Meta-SAIGE to 83 low-prevalence phenotypes in UK Biobank and All of Us whole-exome sequencing data identified 237 gene–trait associations. Notably, 80 of these associations were not significant in either dataset alone, underscoring the power of our meta-analysis.