<p>Epigenetic mechanisms have long been proposed to act as molecular mnemonics<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR2" CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef></sup>, but whether the epigenetic makeup of a single genomic site can guide learnt behaviors remains unknown. Here we combined CRISPR-based epigenetic editing tools<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR4">4</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR5">5</CitationRef></sup> with c-Fos-driven engram technologies<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR6">6</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR7">7</CitationRef></sup> to address this question in memory-bearing neuronal ensembles. Focusing on the promoter of <i>Arc</i>, which encodes a master regulator of synaptic plasticity<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR8">8</CitationRef></sup>, we found that its locus-specific and temporally controlled epigenetic editing is necessary and sufficient to regulate memory expression. Such effects occurred irrespective of the memory phase—during the initially labile period after learning and for fully consolidated memories—and were reversible within subject, testifying to their inherent plasticity. These findings provide a proof-of-principle that site-specific epigenetic dynamics are causally implicated in memory expression.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Cell-type- and locus-specific epigenetic editing of memory expression

  • Davide M. Coda,
  • Lisa Watt,
  • Liliane Glauser,
  • Mykhailo Y. Batiuk,
  • Allison M. Burns,
  • Cora L. Stahl,
  • Lok Y. Wong,
  • Johannes Gräff

摘要

Epigenetic mechanisms have long been proposed to act as molecular mnemonics13, but whether the epigenetic makeup of a single genomic site can guide learnt behaviors remains unknown. Here we combined CRISPR-based epigenetic editing tools4,5 with c-Fos-driven engram technologies6,7 to address this question in memory-bearing neuronal ensembles. Focusing on the promoter of Arc, which encodes a master regulator of synaptic plasticity8, we found that its locus-specific and temporally controlled epigenetic editing is necessary and sufficient to regulate memory expression. Such effects occurred irrespective of the memory phase—during the initially labile period after learning and for fully consolidated memories—and were reversible within subject, testifying to their inherent plasticity. These findings provide a proof-of-principle that site-specific epigenetic dynamics are causally implicated in memory expression.