<p>Climate assessments of civil aviation<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef></sup> have consistently quantified the dominant climate-forcing components: (1) CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, (2) NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> (NO + NO<sub>2</sub>) emissions and (3) persistent contrails. All three components exert a positive radiative forcing (RF) and lead to climate warming of similar magnitudes. The aviation community is actively seeking to reduce its climate footprint through advanced engine technologies, more sustainable aviation fuel and optimal routing plans<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR4 CR5 CR6 CR7 CR8 CR9 CR10 CR11" CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR12">12</CitationRef></sup>. These approaches usually involve a trade-off of CO<sub>2</sub> against NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> or contrails (non-CO<sub>2</sub>), such as burning 1% more fuel to decrease contrail RF by 4%. Here, we show that a climate-trade-off risk curve derived from uncertainties in the RF components<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef>,<CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR14 CR15" CitationID="CR13">13</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR16">16</CitationRef></sup> can give the probability that a specified trade-off ratio will produce a climate benefit. For each component, we calculate the integrated effective RF resulting from 1 year of flights: global warming per activity (GWA). The complementary cumulative probability distribution of the GWA(non-CO<sub>2</sub>) to GWA(CO<sub>2</sub>) ratio results in a climate-trade-off risk curve giving the likelihood of a positive climate outcome as a function of the trade-off-CO<sub>2</sub> to trade-off-non-CO<sub>2</sub> ratio, because the product, GWA × trade-off, should be the same for both. We find a likely (67%) chance of climate mitigation on a 100-year time horizon for the above suggested ratio of 1:4, favouring proposed non-CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation efforts<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR4 CR5 CR6 CR7 CR8 CR9 CR10 CR11" CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR12">12</CitationRef></sup> with ratios smaller than this.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Trade-offs in aviation impacts on climate favour non-CO2 mitigation

  • Michael J. Prather,
  • Andrew Gettelman,
  • Joyce E. Penner

摘要

Climate assessments of civil aviation1,2 have consistently quantified the dominant climate-forcing components: (1) CO2 emissions, (2) NOx (NO + NO2) emissions and (3) persistent contrails. All three components exert a positive radiative forcing (RF) and lead to climate warming of similar magnitudes. The aviation community is actively seeking to reduce its climate footprint through advanced engine technologies, more sustainable aviation fuel and optimal routing plans312. These approaches usually involve a trade-off of CO2 against NOx or contrails (non-CO2), such as burning 1% more fuel to decrease contrail RF by 4%. Here, we show that a climate-trade-off risk curve derived from uncertainties in the RF components2,1316 can give the probability that a specified trade-off ratio will produce a climate benefit. For each component, we calculate the integrated effective RF resulting from 1 year of flights: global warming per activity (GWA). The complementary cumulative probability distribution of the GWA(non-CO2) to GWA(CO2) ratio results in a climate-trade-off risk curve giving the likelihood of a positive climate outcome as a function of the trade-off-CO2 to trade-off-non-CO2 ratio, because the product, GWA × trade-off, should be the same for both. We find a likely (67%) chance of climate mitigation on a 100-year time horizon for the above suggested ratio of 1:4, favouring proposed non-CO2 mitigation efforts312 with ratios smaller than this.