<p>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a time-sensitive emergency that requires prompt identification and intervention: sudden, unwitnessed cardiac arrest is nearly unsurvivable<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR2" CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef></sup>. A cardinal sign of cardiac arrest is sudden loss of pulse<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR4">4</CitationRef></sup>. Automated biosensor detection of unwitnessed cardiac arrest, and dispatch of medical assistance, may improve survivability given the substantial prognostic role of time<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR5">5</CitationRef></sup>, but only if the false-positive burden on public emergency medical systems is minimized<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR6" CitationID="CR5">5</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR7">7</CitationRef></sup>. Here we show that a multimodal, machine learning-based algorithm on a smartwatch can reach performance thresholds making it deployable at a societal scale. First, using photoplethysmography, we show that wearable photoplethysmography measurements of peripheral pulselessness (induced through an arterial occlusion model) manifest similarly to pulselessness caused by a common cardiac arrest arrhythmia, ventricular fibrillation. On the basis of the similarity of the photoplethysmography signal (from ventricular fibrillation or arterial occlusion), we developed and validated a loss of pulse detection algorithm using data from peripheral pulselessness and free-living conditions. Following its development, we evaluated the end-to-end algorithm prospectively: there was 1 unintentional emergency call per 21.67 user-years across two prospective studies; the sensitivity was 67.23% (95% confidence interval of 64.32% to 70.05%) in a prospective arterial occlusion cardiac arrest simulation model. These results indicate an opportunity, deployable at scale, for wearable-based detection of sudden loss of pulse while minimizing societal costs of excess false detections<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR7">7</CitationRef></sup>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Automated loss of pulse detection on a consumer smartwatch

  • Kamal Shah,
  • Anran Wang,
  • Yiwen Chen,
  • Jitender Munjal,
  • Sumeet Chhabra,
  • Anthony Stange,
  • Enxun Wei,
  • Tuan Phan,
  • Tracy Giest,
  • Beszel Hawkins,
  • Dinesh Puppala,
  • Elsina Silver,
  • Lawrence Cai,
  • Shruti Rajagopalan,
  • Edward Shi,
  • Yun-Ling Lee,
  • Matt Wimmer,
  • Pramod Rudrapatna,
  • Thomas Rea,
  • Shelten Yuen,
  • Anupam Pathak,
  • Shwetak Patel,
  • Mark Malhotra,
  • Marc Stogaitis,
  • Jeanie Phan,
  • Bakul Patel,
  • Adam Vasquez,
  • Christina Fox,
  • Alistair Connell,
  • Jim Taylor,
  • Jacqueline Shreibati,
  • David Miller,
  • Daniel McDuff,
  • Pushmeet Kohli,
  • Tajinder Gadh,
  • Jake Sunshine

摘要

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a time-sensitive emergency that requires prompt identification and intervention: sudden, unwitnessed cardiac arrest is nearly unsurvivable13. A cardinal sign of cardiac arrest is sudden loss of pulse4. Automated biosensor detection of unwitnessed cardiac arrest, and dispatch of medical assistance, may improve survivability given the substantial prognostic role of time3,5, but only if the false-positive burden on public emergency medical systems is minimized57. Here we show that a multimodal, machine learning-based algorithm on a smartwatch can reach performance thresholds making it deployable at a societal scale. First, using photoplethysmography, we show that wearable photoplethysmography measurements of peripheral pulselessness (induced through an arterial occlusion model) manifest similarly to pulselessness caused by a common cardiac arrest arrhythmia, ventricular fibrillation. On the basis of the similarity of the photoplethysmography signal (from ventricular fibrillation or arterial occlusion), we developed and validated a loss of pulse detection algorithm using data from peripheral pulselessness and free-living conditions. Following its development, we evaluated the end-to-end algorithm prospectively: there was 1 unintentional emergency call per 21.67 user-years across two prospective studies; the sensitivity was 67.23% (95% confidence interval of 64.32% to 70.05%) in a prospective arterial occlusion cardiac arrest simulation model. These results indicate an opportunity, deployable at scale, for wearable-based detection of sudden loss of pulse while minimizing societal costs of excess false detections7.