<p>The amount of methane released to the atmosphere from the Nord Stream subsea pipeline leaks remains uncertain, as reflected in a wide range of estimates<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR2 CR3 CR4 CR5 CR6 CR7 CR8 CR9 CR10 CR11 CR12 CR13 CR14 CR15 CR16 CR17" CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR18">18</CitationRef></sup>. A lack of information regarding the temporal variation in atmospheric emissions has made it challenging to reconcile pipeline volumetric (bottom-up) estimates<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR2 CR3 CR4 CR5 CR6 CR7" CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR8">8</CitationRef></sup> with measurement-based (top-down) estimates<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR9 CR10 CR11 CR12 CR13 CR14 CR15 CR16 CR17" CitationID="CR8">8</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR18">18</CitationRef></sup>. Here we simulate pipeline rupture emission rates and integrate these with methane dissolution and sea-surface outgassing estimates<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR9">9</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR10">10</CitationRef></sup> to model the evolution of atmospheric emissions from the leaks. We verify our modelled atmospheric emissions by comparing them with top-down point-in-time emission-rate estimates and cumulative emission estimates derived from airborne<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR11">11</CitationRef></sup>, satellite<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR8">8</CitationRef>,<CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR13" CitationID="CR12">12</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR14">14</CitationRef></sup> and tall tower data. We obtain consistency between our modelled atmospheric emissions and top-down estimates and find that 465 ± 20 thousand metric tons of methane were emitted to the atmosphere. Although, to our knowledge, this represents the largest recorded amount of methane released from a single transient event, it is equivalent to 0.1% of anthropogenic methane emissions for 2022. The impact of the leaks on the global atmospheric methane budget brings into focus the numerous other anthropogenic methane sources that require mitigation globally. Our analysis demonstrates that diverse, complementary measurement approaches are needed to quantify methane emissions in support of the Global Methane Pledge<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR19">19</CitationRef></sup>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Methane emissions from the Nord Stream subsea pipeline leaks

  • Stephen J. Harris,
  • Stefan Schwietzke,
  • James L. France,
  • Nataly Velandia Salinas,
  • Tania Meixus Fernandez,
  • Cynthia Randles,
  • Luis Guanter,
  • Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate,
  • Andreea Calcan,
  • Ilse Aben,
  • Katarina Abrahamsson,
  • Paul Balcombe,
  • Antoine Berchet,
  • Louise C. Biddle,
  • Henry C. Bittig,
  • Christian Böttcher,
  • Timo Bouvard,
  • Göran Broström,
  • Valentin Bruch,
  • Massimo Cassiani,
  • Martyn P. Chipperfield,
  • Philippe Ciais,
  • Ellen Damm,
  • Enrico Dammers,
  • Hugo Denier van der Gon,
  • Matthieu Dogniaux,
  • Emily Dowd,
  • François Dupouy,
  • Sabine Eckhardt,
  • Nikolaos Evangeliou,
  • Wuhu Feng,
  • Mengwei Jia,
  • Fei Jiang,
  • Andrea K. Kaiser-Weiss,
  • Ines Kamoun,
  • Brian J. Kerridge,
  • Astrid Lampert,
  • José Lana,
  • Fei Li,
  • Joannes D. Maasakkers,
  • Jean-Philippe W. Maclean,
  • Buhalqem Mamtimin,
  • Julia Marshall,
  • Gédéon Mauger,
  • Anouar Mekkas,
  • Christian Mielke,
  • Martin Mohrmann,
  • David P. Moore,
  • Riccardo Nanni,
  • Falk Pätzold,
  • Isabelle Pison,
  • Ignacio Pisso,
  • Stephen M. Platt,
  • Raphaël Préa,
  • Bastien Y. Queste,
  • Michel Ramonet,
  • Gregor Rehder,
  • John J. Remedios,
  • Friedemann Reum,
  • Anke Roiger,
  • Norbert Schmidbauer,
  • Richard Siddans,
  • Anusha Sunkisala,
  • Rona L. Thompson,
  • Daniel J. Varon,
  • Lucy J. Ventress,
  • Chris Wilson,
  • Yuzhong Zhang

摘要

The amount of methane released to the atmosphere from the Nord Stream subsea pipeline leaks remains uncertain, as reflected in a wide range of estimates118. A lack of information regarding the temporal variation in atmospheric emissions has made it challenging to reconcile pipeline volumetric (bottom-up) estimates18 with measurement-based (top-down) estimates818. Here we simulate pipeline rupture emission rates and integrate these with methane dissolution and sea-surface outgassing estimates9,10 to model the evolution of atmospheric emissions from the leaks. We verify our modelled atmospheric emissions by comparing them with top-down point-in-time emission-rate estimates and cumulative emission estimates derived from airborne11, satellite8,1214 and tall tower data. We obtain consistency between our modelled atmospheric emissions and top-down estimates and find that 465 ± 20 thousand metric tons of methane were emitted to the atmosphere. Although, to our knowledge, this represents the largest recorded amount of methane released from a single transient event, it is equivalent to 0.1% of anthropogenic methane emissions for 2022. The impact of the leaks on the global atmospheric methane budget brings into focus the numerous other anthropogenic methane sources that require mitigation globally. Our analysis demonstrates that diverse, complementary measurement approaches are needed to quantify methane emissions in support of the Global Methane Pledge19.