<p>Nomenclature for the disease widely known as Sjögren syndrome has proven unsatisfactory. Patients have perceived ‘syndrome’ as indicative of a vague collection of symptoms, prompting the Sjögren’s Foundation to abandon the term. Furthermore, the traditional distinction between ‘primary’ and ‘secondary’ forms fails to account for the complex interplay between overlapping autoimmune diseases. Following a bibliometric analysis, systematic literature review and a Delphi consensus process with equal involvement of professional and patient representatives, five recommendations are now issued. First, the term ‘Sjögren disease’ should replace ‘Sjögren syndrome’. Second, the acronym ‘SjD’ should be used as an abbreviation for ‘Sjögren disease’. Third, the descriptor ‘associated’ should be used in lieu of ‘secondary’ for Sjögren disease occurring in association with a second systemic autoimmune disease for which classification criteria are fulfilled. Fourth, Sjögren disease is the preferred terminology in common parlance and in clinical diagnosis, without differentiation as to primary and associated forms. Fifth, the differentiation between primary and associated Sjögren is recommended for scientific studies to define a homogeneous population. In conclusion, the consensus endorses ‘Sjögren disease’ as the official nomenclature to acknowledge the distinct pathogenesis of this disorder and to improve clarity in both clinical practice and research.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

2023 International Rome consensus for the nomenclature of Sjögren disease

  • Manuel Ramos-Casals,
  • Alan N. Baer,
  • María del Pilar Brito-Zerón,
  • Katherine M. Hammitt,
  • Coralie Bouillot,
  • Soledad Retamozo,
  • Alison Mackey,
  • David Yarowsky,
  • Breck Turner,
  • Jaime Blanck,
  • Benjamin A. Fisher,
  • Esen K. Akpek,
  • Chiara Baldini,
  • Hendrika Bootsma,
  • Simon J. Bowman,
  • Thomas Dörner,
  • Leslie Laing,
  • Scott M. Lieberman,
  • Xavier Mariette,
  • Stephen C. Pflugfelder,
  • Vidya Sankar,
  • Antoni Sisó-Almirall,
  • Athanasios G. Tzioufas,
  • Juan-Manuel Anaya,
  • Berkan Armağan,
  • Michele Bombardieri,
  • Steven Carsons,
  • Salvatore de Vita,
  • Robert I. Fox,
  • Roberto Gerli,
  • Roberto Giacomelli,
  • Jacques Eric Gottenberg,
  • Gabriela Hernández-Molina,
  • Roland Jonsson,
  • Aike Kruize,
  • Seung-Ki Kwok,
  • Xiaomei Li,
  • Sara S. McCoy,
  • Wan-Fai Ng,
  • Peter Olsson,
  • Maureen Rischmueller,
  • Alain Saraux,
  • R. Hal Scofield,
  • Valéria Valim,
  • Claudio Vitali,
  • Frederick Vivino,
  • Marie Wahren-Herlenius,
  • Haralampos M. Moutsopoulos,
  • Miriam Akasbi,
  • Alessia Alunno,
  • Fabiola Atzeni,
  • Elena Bartoloni,
  • Stefano Bombardieri,
  • Arthur Bookman,
  • Francesco Carubbi,
  • Sandra Consani- Fernández,
  • Divi Cornec,
  • Valerie Devauchelle-Pensec,
  • Tamer A. Gheita,
  • Andreas Goules,
  • Benedikt Hofauer,
  • Nevsun Inanc,
  • Ciprian Jurcut,
  • Clio P. Mavragani,
  • Jacques Morel,
  • Takashi Nakamura,
  • Gaëtane Nocturne,
  • Gunnel Nordmark,
  • Sandra Gofinet Pasoto,
  • Jacques-Olivier Pers,
  • Sonja Praprotnik,
  • Roberta Priori,
  • Sandhya Pulukool,
  • Luca Quartuccio,
  • Astrid Rasmussen,
  • Vasco C. Romão,
  • Agata Sebastian,
  • Raphaèle Seror,
  • Roser Solans-Laqué,
  • Yasunori Suzuki,
  • Antonia Szanto,
  • Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani,
  • Arjan Vissink

摘要

Nomenclature for the disease widely known as Sjögren syndrome has proven unsatisfactory. Patients have perceived ‘syndrome’ as indicative of a vague collection of symptoms, prompting the Sjögren’s Foundation to abandon the term. Furthermore, the traditional distinction between ‘primary’ and ‘secondary’ forms fails to account for the complex interplay between overlapping autoimmune diseases. Following a bibliometric analysis, systematic literature review and a Delphi consensus process with equal involvement of professional and patient representatives, five recommendations are now issued. First, the term ‘Sjögren disease’ should replace ‘Sjögren syndrome’. Second, the acronym ‘SjD’ should be used as an abbreviation for ‘Sjögren disease’. Third, the descriptor ‘associated’ should be used in lieu of ‘secondary’ for Sjögren disease occurring in association with a second systemic autoimmune disease for which classification criteria are fulfilled. Fourth, Sjögren disease is the preferred terminology in common parlance and in clinical diagnosis, without differentiation as to primary and associated forms. Fifth, the differentiation between primary and associated Sjögren is recommended for scientific studies to define a homogeneous population. In conclusion, the consensus endorses ‘Sjögren disease’ as the official nomenclature to acknowledge the distinct pathogenesis of this disorder and to improve clarity in both clinical practice and research.