<p>Diet, microbiome, inflammation and host genetics have been linked to colorectal cancer development; however, it is not clear whether and how these factors interact to promote carcinogenesis. Here we used <i>Il10</i><sup>−<i>/</i>−</sup> mice colonized with bacteria previously associated with colorectal cancer: enterotoxigenic <i>Bacteroides fragilis</i>, <i>Helicobacter hepaticus</i> or colibactin-producing (polyketide synthase-positive (<i>pks</i><sup>+</sup>)) <i>Escherichia coli</i> and fed either a low-carbohydrate (LC) diet deficient in soluble fibre, a high-fat and high-sugar diet, or a normal chow diet. Colonic polyposis was increased in mice colonized with <i>pks</i><sup>+</sup> <i>E. coli</i> and fed the LC diet. Mechanistically, mucosal inflammation was increased in the LC-diet-fed mice, leading to diminished colonic PPAR-γ signalling and increased luminal nitrate levels. This promoted both <i>pks</i><sup>+</sup> <i>E. coli</i> growth and colibactin-induced DNA damage. PPAR-γ agonists or supplementation with dietary soluble fibre in the form of inulin reverted inflammatory and polyposis phenotypes. The <i>pks</i><sup>+</sup> <i>E. coli</i> also induced more polyps in mismatch-repair-deficient mice by inducing a senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Moreover, oncogenic effects were further potentiated by inflammatory triggers in the mismatch-repair-deficient model. These data reveal that diet and host genetics influence the oncogenic potential of a common bacterium.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Dietary fibre counters the oncogenic potential of colibactin-producing Escherichia coli in colorectal cancer

  • Bhupesh Kumar Thakur,
  • Yann Malaise,
  • Saurav Roy Choudhury,
  • Anna Neustaeter,
  • Williams Turpin,
  • Catherine Streutker,
  • Julia Copeland,
  • Erin O. Y. Wong,
  • William W. Navarre,
  • David S. Guttman,
  • Christian Jobin,
  • Kenneth Croitoru,
  • Alberto Martin

摘要

Diet, microbiome, inflammation and host genetics have been linked to colorectal cancer development; however, it is not clear whether and how these factors interact to promote carcinogenesis. Here we used Il10/ mice colonized with bacteria previously associated with colorectal cancer: enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis, Helicobacter hepaticus or colibactin-producing (polyketide synthase-positive (pks+)) Escherichia coli and fed either a low-carbohydrate (LC) diet deficient in soluble fibre, a high-fat and high-sugar diet, or a normal chow diet. Colonic polyposis was increased in mice colonized with pks+ E. coli and fed the LC diet. Mechanistically, mucosal inflammation was increased in the LC-diet-fed mice, leading to diminished colonic PPAR-γ signalling and increased luminal nitrate levels. This promoted both pks+ E. coli growth and colibactin-induced DNA damage. PPAR-γ agonists or supplementation with dietary soluble fibre in the form of inulin reverted inflammatory and polyposis phenotypes. The pks+ E. coli also induced more polyps in mismatch-repair-deficient mice by inducing a senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Moreover, oncogenic effects were further potentiated by inflammatory triggers in the mismatch-repair-deficient model. These data reveal that diet and host genetics influence the oncogenic potential of a common bacterium.