Scholarlink

<p>Wildfire is among the fastest-growing economic risks of climate change, yet cost-effective adaptation strategies remain underexplored. In the electric power sector, where utility infrastructure has ignited some of the most destructive fires, companies are investing heavily to reduce risk. Here we evaluate the costs, reliability implications and risk-reduction benefits of the largest utility wildfire mitigation programme in the United States. Using weather and vegetation data for 25,000 miles of high-risk power lines, we develop a predictive model of ignition risk and compare outcomes across locations that had similar risk profiles but received different interventions. A newer strategy—adjusting protective device sensitivity during high-risk conditions—has reduced more wildfire risk at lower cost per avoided structure burned than conventional approaches such as undergrounding or vegetation management. Our results underscore the importance of comprehensive accounting of costs, risks and reliability when evaluating adaptation investments, particularly where capital-intensive measures may be over-incentivized.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Dynamic grid management reduces wildfire adaptation costs in the electric power sector

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月25日

查看全文
  • Cody Warner,
  • Duncan Callaway,
  • Meredith Fowlie

摘要

Wildfire is among the fastest-growing economic risks of climate change, yet cost-effective adaptation strategies remain underexplored. In the electric power sector, where utility infrastructure has ignited some of the most destructive fires, companies are investing heavily to reduce risk. Here we evaluate the costs, reliability implications and risk-reduction benefits of the largest utility wildfire mitigation programme in the United States. Using weather and vegetation data for 25,000 miles of high-risk power lines, we develop a predictive model of ignition risk and compare outcomes across locations that had similar risk profiles but received different interventions. A newer strategy—adjusting protective device sensitivity during high-risk conditions—has reduced more wildfire risk at lower cost per avoided structure burned than conventional approaches such as undergrounding or vegetation management. Our results underscore the importance of comprehensive accounting of costs, risks and reliability when evaluating adaptation investments, particularly where capital-intensive measures may be over-incentivized.