<p>The global clinical trial landscape for multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) exhibits a striking geographic anomaly. Through a systematic analysis of 8212 lung cancer registrations (2015–2024), we identified a cohort of 17 trials explicitly targeting MPLC. Analysis revealed an absolute geographic monopole: 100% of these trials were investigator-initiated in China, with a complete absence of active protocols in Western registries. We argue that this segregation is not accidental but driven by the “Asian phenotype”,which is characterized by indolent, multifocal ground-glass nodules (GGNs), demands lung-sparing local strategies distinct from the systemic paradigms favored in the West. We urge the international community to transition from universal guidelines to phenotype-stratified management frameworks.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The “Asian Paradox” in multiple primary lung cancer: a geographic monopole driven by phenotypic divergence

  • Jianwei Shi,
  • Yushun Gao

摘要

The global clinical trial landscape for multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) exhibits a striking geographic anomaly. Through a systematic analysis of 8212 lung cancer registrations (2015–2024), we identified a cohort of 17 trials explicitly targeting MPLC. Analysis revealed an absolute geographic monopole: 100% of these trials were investigator-initiated in China, with a complete absence of active protocols in Western registries. We argue that this segregation is not accidental but driven by the “Asian phenotype”,which is characterized by indolent, multifocal ground-glass nodules (GGNs), demands lung-sparing local strategies distinct from the systemic paradigms favored in the West. We urge the international community to transition from universal guidelines to phenotype-stratified management frameworks.