Scholarlink

<p>Target 3 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework aims to increase global protected and conserved area coverage to at least 30% by 2030. The impact on people, whether positive or negative, will depend on the social context of additional areas and how they are governed and managed. Here, we show that Target 3 could affect large and socially diverse populations under different implementation scenarios. Nearly half the human population lives within 10 km of areas included in a scenario maximising biodiversity representation. Four percent live near areas included in an Indigenous and traditional territories-based scenario, including many in areas with low Human Development Index scores (74%) and high participation in wild harvesting (91%). A scenario prioritising nature’s contributions to people is intermediate on all measures. Our results demonstrate that Target 3 is a highly ambitious social as well as ecological target, requiring an equally ambitious commitment to development funding and support for local residents.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Social implications of the 30×30 global conservation target

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月12日

查看全文
  • Javier Fajardo,
  • Heather C. Bingham,
  • Dan Brockington,
  • Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer,
  • James A. Fitzsimons,
  • Forrest Fleischman,
  • Alain Frechette,
  • Rachael D. Garrett,
  • Carolina Hazin,
  • Tobias Kuemmerle,
  • Janeth Lessmann,
  • Milagre O. F. Nuvunga,
  • Brian O’Donnell,
  • Fred Onyai,
  • Ruth Pinto,
  • Marion Pfeifer,
  • Rose Pritchard,
  • Casey M. Ryan,
  • Priya Shyamsundar,
  • Josefa Cariño Tauli,
  • David Mwesigye Tumusiime,
  • Jasmin Upton,
  • Gary R. Watmough,
  • Julie G. Zaehringer,
  • Chris Sandbrook

摘要

Target 3 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework aims to increase global protected and conserved area coverage to at least 30% by 2030. The impact on people, whether positive or negative, will depend on the social context of additional areas and how they are governed and managed. Here, we show that Target 3 could affect large and socially diverse populations under different implementation scenarios. Nearly half the human population lives within 10 km of areas included in a scenario maximising biodiversity representation. Four percent live near areas included in an Indigenous and traditional territories-based scenario, including many in areas with low Human Development Index scores (74%) and high participation in wild harvesting (91%). A scenario prioritising nature’s contributions to people is intermediate on all measures. Our results demonstrate that Target 3 is a highly ambitious social as well as ecological target, requiring an equally ambitious commitment to development funding and support for local residents.