Scholarlink

<p>Intercontinental spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses poses significant pandemic risks and necessitates strong protective countermeasures. We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir, the polymerase inhibitors baloxavir and favipiravir, and an ion-channel blocker amantadine, against severe influenza A(H5N1) virus infection in female BALB/c mice. Baloxavir (≥10 mg/kg, 1 dose) fully protected mice from death, significantly reduced virus respiratory replication, and prevented neuroinvasion. Oseltamivir (≥100 mg/kg/day for 5 days) provided limited survival benefits, reduced lung titers but failed to prevent viral neuroinvasion. Favipiravir (≥100 mg/kg/day for 5 days) provided partial protection, although did not reduce viral titers in lungs and brain. Amantadine provided no benefits. Although all drugs inhibited A(H5N1) viruses in vitro, in vivo correlations did not extend beyond baloxavir. Our results indicate that baloxavir is the most reliable treatment to address both respiratory replication and systemic spread of contemporary A(H5N1) viruses in mice and should be considered in pandemic planning.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Baloxavir outperforms oseltamivir, favipiravir, and amantadine in treating lethal influenza A(H5N1) HA clade 2.3.4.4b infection in mice

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月19日

查看全文
  • Konstantin Andreev,
  • Jeremy C. Jones,
  • Ahmed Kandeil,
  • Peter Vogel,
  • Richard J. Webby,
  • Elena A. Govorkova

摘要

Intercontinental spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses poses significant pandemic risks and necessitates strong protective countermeasures. We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir, the polymerase inhibitors baloxavir and favipiravir, and an ion-channel blocker amantadine, against severe influenza A(H5N1) virus infection in female BALB/c mice. Baloxavir (≥10 mg/kg, 1 dose) fully protected mice from death, significantly reduced virus respiratory replication, and prevented neuroinvasion. Oseltamivir (≥100 mg/kg/day for 5 days) provided limited survival benefits, reduced lung titers but failed to prevent viral neuroinvasion. Favipiravir (≥100 mg/kg/day for 5 days) provided partial protection, although did not reduce viral titers in lungs and brain. Amantadine provided no benefits. Although all drugs inhibited A(H5N1) viruses in vitro, in vivo correlations did not extend beyond baloxavir. Our results indicate that baloxavir is the most reliable treatment to address both respiratory replication and systemic spread of contemporary A(H5N1) viruses in mice and should be considered in pandemic planning.