Scholarlink

<p>Diagnosing sleep disordered breathing requires manual annotation of events from sleep studies, such as nocturnal polysomnography, a process that is time-intensive, costly, and prone to inter-rater variability. Automatic approaches exist but lack generalizability due to signal variability across centers. We develop an automatic apneic breathing event detector to localize and classify obstructive apneas, central apneas, hypopneas, and isolated respiratory events without arousals or desaturations. The model is trained on 5456 polysomnographies and tested on 1099 polysomnographies from six cohorts uses an end-to-end deep learning architecture. The model’s predictions show a strong correlation with expert annotations for apnea-hypopnea index (r² = 0.84) and achieve an F1 score of 0.78 across apnea event types, with specific F1 scores of 0.71, 0.51, and 0.65 for obstructive apnea, central apnea, and hypopnea events, respectively. In two independent, multi-scored datasets, The model performs comparably or better than individual expert raters. The model’s probabilistic output, termed “apnotyping,” provides insights into sleep disordered breathing etiology, with event probabilities correlating more strongly with key sleep apnea traits—such as loop gain and pharyngeal muscle compensation—than traditional apnea indexes. This probabilistic approach may enhance diagnostic accuracy and support personalized treatment strategies, leading to improved patient outcomes.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Expert-level probabilistic breathing event detector informs phenotyping of sleep apnea

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月9日

查看全文
  • Magnus Ruud Kjaer,
  • Umaer Hanif,
  • Andreas Brink-Kjaer,
  • Mads Olsen,
  • Oliver Sum-Ping,
  • Oscar Carrillo,
  • Scott A. Sands,
  • Susan Redline,
  • Katie L. Stone,
  • Poul Jennum,
  • Emmanuel Mignot

摘要

Diagnosing sleep disordered breathing requires manual annotation of events from sleep studies, such as nocturnal polysomnography, a process that is time-intensive, costly, and prone to inter-rater variability. Automatic approaches exist but lack generalizability due to signal variability across centers. We develop an automatic apneic breathing event detector to localize and classify obstructive apneas, central apneas, hypopneas, and isolated respiratory events without arousals or desaturations. The model is trained on 5456 polysomnographies and tested on 1099 polysomnographies from six cohorts uses an end-to-end deep learning architecture. The model’s predictions show a strong correlation with expert annotations for apnea-hypopnea index (r² = 0.84) and achieve an F1 score of 0.78 across apnea event types, with specific F1 scores of 0.71, 0.51, and 0.65 for obstructive apnea, central apnea, and hypopnea events, respectively. In two independent, multi-scored datasets, The model performs comparably or better than individual expert raters. The model’s probabilistic output, termed “apnotyping,” provides insights into sleep disordered breathing etiology, with event probabilities correlating more strongly with key sleep apnea traits—such as loop gain and pharyngeal muscle compensation—than traditional apnea indexes. This probabilistic approach may enhance diagnostic accuracy and support personalized treatment strategies, leading to improved patient outcomes.