<p>The discovery of “giant” (or non-classical) electrostrictors has reignited interest in electrostriction, a second-order electromechanical coupling phenomenon. While the relationship between the generated strain and the square of the electric field may seem straightforward, determining the sign of the electrostrictive coefficients proves challenging, as evidenced by the opposite signs reported by various research groups. We show that electrostrictive coefficients must be treated as complex values with their sign dictated by their phases rather than by the overall shape of the strain versus electric field curve. Moreover, our analysis of the electrostrictive properties of La<sub>2</sub>Mo<sub>2</sub>O<sub>9</sub> ceramics reveals that both the electrostrictive coefficients and the induced strains may undergo sign changes when the frequency varies, with each sign change occurring at its own critical frequency. Finally, we introduce a model to explain the differing frequency response of the electrostrictive coefficients.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Electrostriction: it is just a phase

  • Jiacheng Yu,
  • Abdelali Zaki,
  • Killian Mache,
  • Omar Ibder,
  • Sandrine Coste,
  • Maud Barré,
  • Philippe Lacorre,
  • Pierre-Eymeric Janolin

摘要

The discovery of “giant” (or non-classical) electrostrictors has reignited interest in electrostriction, a second-order electromechanical coupling phenomenon. While the relationship between the generated strain and the square of the electric field may seem straightforward, determining the sign of the electrostrictive coefficients proves challenging, as evidenced by the opposite signs reported by various research groups. We show that electrostrictive coefficients must be treated as complex values with their sign dictated by their phases rather than by the overall shape of the strain versus electric field curve. Moreover, our analysis of the electrostrictive properties of La2Mo2O9 ceramics reveals that both the electrostrictive coefficients and the induced strains may undergo sign changes when the frequency varies, with each sign change occurring at its own critical frequency. Finally, we introduce a model to explain the differing frequency response of the electrostrictive coefficients.