<p>Deep learning (DL) enabled liquid-based cytology has potential for cervical cancer screening or triage. Here, we develop a DL model using whole cytology slides from 17,397 women and test it on 10,826 additional cases through a three-stage process. The DL model achieves robust performance across nine hospitals. In a multi-reader, multi-case study, it outperforms cytopathologists’ sensitivity by 9%. Reading time significantly decreases with DL assistance (218s vs 30s; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). In community-based organized screening, the DL model’s sensitivity matches that of senior cytopathologists (0.878 vs 0.854; <i>p</i> &gt; 0.999), yet it has reduced specificity (0.831 vs 0.901; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Notably, hospital-based opportunistic screening shows that junior cytopathologists with DL assistance significantly improve both their sensitivity and specificity (0.857 vs 0.657, 0.840 vs 0.737; both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). When triaging human papillomavirus-positive cases, DL assistance exhibits better performance than junior cytopathologists alone. These findings support using the DL model as an assistance tool in cervical screening and case triage.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Deep learning enabled liquid-based cytology model for cervical precancer and cancer detection

  • Peng Xue,
  • Le Dang,
  • Ling-Hua Kong,
  • Hong-Ping Tang,
  • Hai-Miao Xu,
  • Hai-Yan Weng,
  • Zhe Wang,
  • Rong-Gan Wei,
  • Lian Xu,
  • Hong-Xia Li,
  • Hai-Yan Niu,
  • Ming-Juan Wang,
  • Zi-Chen Ye,
  • Zhi-Fang Li,
  • Wen Chen,
  • Qin-Jing Pan,
  • Xun Zhang,
  • Remila Rezhake,
  • Li Zhang,
  • Yu Jiang,
  • You-Lin Qiao,
  • Lan Zhu,
  • Fang-Hui Zhao

摘要

Deep learning (DL) enabled liquid-based cytology has potential for cervical cancer screening or triage. Here, we develop a DL model using whole cytology slides from 17,397 women and test it on 10,826 additional cases through a three-stage process. The DL model achieves robust performance across nine hospitals. In a multi-reader, multi-case study, it outperforms cytopathologists’ sensitivity by 9%. Reading time significantly decreases with DL assistance (218s vs 30s; p < 0.0001). In community-based organized screening, the DL model’s sensitivity matches that of senior cytopathologists (0.878 vs 0.854; p > 0.999), yet it has reduced specificity (0.831 vs 0.901; p < 0.0001). Notably, hospital-based opportunistic screening shows that junior cytopathologists with DL assistance significantly improve both their sensitivity and specificity (0.857 vs 0.657, 0.840 vs 0.737; both p < 0.0001). When triaging human papillomavirus-positive cases, DL assistance exhibits better performance than junior cytopathologists alone. These findings support using the DL model as an assistance tool in cervical screening and case triage.